[citation][nom]formin[/nom]Instead of paying for a supercomputer they should rent computing power from the general public. There is an insane amount of computing power out there doing nothing. A 100,000 or more average home PCs connected to some distributed super computing service through the internet. The folding @ home program has the basic idea but a company should start up that actually pays people for their computing power when they arent using it.I'm sure this would be a much cheaper route as there is no power or hardware costs. How much did is this K Beast going to cost again?[/citation]
There is a fundamental problem there, with folding and Seti@home, those are easily distributed since work units are nice and separable, one unit does not depend on another. Not all problems can be separated out that way. Climate science and model prediction is one, where there are so many variables so interdependent on each other that if you're waiting a week for half the work units to come in before the next grouping goes out, the latency will negate all the gain from using so many computers.
Oil exploration, large scale cosmology, massive physics simulations, high speed material analysis, there are many many problems that are just very large and not easily broken down. Plus if someone is renting the time out and the company who is buying the computer time and the data or work they are doing is trade secret, what better way to do so on a system you can control.