FX 6100 Vs AMD Phenom II X6 1045T? (Without OC)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

half_derpy

Honorable
May 27, 2012
68
0
10,630
Hello.

I am looking to get a new CPU because the one I have is not so great for what I need. Currently I have the AMD Athlon II X4 620 Propus 2.6GHz. It's okay, but man, it is really not that great under load. I do a lot of video editing/rendering, as well as gaming in 1080p and this cpu works well enough, but I feel like I need some more speed. I also have 8 gigs of 1600 DDR3 RAM.

Anyways. I was looking at 3 possible CPU's around a certain price range as I am on a reasonably tight budget.

Keep in mind, I have zero plans to overclock, as it's not something I understand enough to dabble in.

The main CPU I was looking at was the FX 6100. Seems like a great price for a 6 core, but I am reading mixed reviews on it's actual performance.

I was also looking at the Phenom II X6 1045T.

They are both the same price but I just don't know what to get to make it worth while to upgrade from my current cpu.

Again, I'll be doing lots of gaming and video editing/rendering with special effects in After Effects as well as photo editing.

One of the downsides (for me) is that the 6100 is AM3+ and my mobo only supports AM3 currently. So, i'd have to upgrade my motherboard as well. Which isn't THAT big of a deal as I am sporting a micro atx and would kind of like to get a full size ATX board.

What about the Phenom II X4 965 black? It seems to have insanely good reviews. Would it really be that big of a jump? It'd certainly be a lot cheaper than the fx-6100 route (since I'd have to get a new mobo)
 
Solution
I'd take the Phenom II 1045T 2.7GHz base with 3 cores going to 3.2 GHz on turbo and 6 real cores.

FX 6100 FX needs to be around 25% faster clock speed to level with Phenom II in many tasks (its less efficient) so with its 3.3GHz then 3.9 turbo they are going to trade punches in many things.

Phenom has 6 real cores. FX has 6 Bulldozer modules not 6 proper cores. Theres a reason you see 6100 CPU's so seemingly cheap while the thing they replaced (phenom II) is holding and increasing in price....... its not because AMD want to give you a warm fuzzy feeling.

The 965 you mention is a good CPU but not really for you as to really unleash that one you want to Overclock it.

You did good, the aftermarket cooling will keep you in the safe, especially with a 95watt tdp, (which is actually the thermal energy in watts that it can dissipate before trouble), cause if it can handle a 125watt (your mobo), then a 95 with good cooling will have no problem. Grab CPU ALL gadget for windows and the temperature monitor that goes with it and you can keep a eye on it all the time, your max temp is probably around 70 degrees C, but you'll have to check the datasheet for the 1045t, I can't remember.
 


I have all CPU already. Downloaded it a while back for the quad core and kept it around. I also got "Speedfan" and locked the CPU temp to my taskbar so that it's always visible what temps I am running (I do the same for GPU)

So far, I've had zero issues. I did a quick test and rendered out a 1080p video with custom effects and my cpu only got up to 52 under full load for about 15 minutes. It idles 28-31 with the cooler.

Hooray!