AMD can lower the price to even it out? or can they?
In the bottom of the line AMD dont have the same size of "pocket" as intel. Which means that intel can "survive" a long "scale" war.
AMD can lower the price to even it out? or can they?
AMD can lower the price to even it out? or can they?
further to that, is even 20fps+ worth shelling out $1000 for a processor? If AMD's price drop is significant, I do not see this processor really dominating the market except for the extreme performance hungry (without concern for money).
The reality is, most of us are on a budget, and Intel has always been on the low end of that scale. That is the reason AMD is here to stay, at least for a while yet.
Bravo Intel for coming up with some new innovation, but too bad the price does not justify the performance for most.
Conroe seems good, probably the best thing intel released since the pentium 3, but i must say WOT THE HELL ARE AMD DOING?? they have known this was coming for at least a year i say, and they have jus sat still, slugged around and dun f*** all about it, now they say K8L will be here in 2008, this looks like the netburst-k8 war agen but with the companys being the other way around!
The only thing Im a little sad about is that there is no 2mb cache versions in the review, in fact Im having little success in finding the 2mb cache versions in any reviews! I like seeing the super fast versions in all their glory, but Id also like to see the processors Id be able to purchase Especially where theres a cache difference which is harder to estimate than clock speed in my opinion...
Anyone seen any reviews with the other processors? If so, could you post a name or link? Thanks.
1. Conroe is for real; all the hype was right, at least most of it.
2. The $316 E6600 handed the $1,100+ FX-62 it's butt in virtually all benchmarks.
3. The power consumptions on those processors are very, very good.
The race is over when these hit the retail channel. I'd like to see MadModMike come back and explain this article.
Where's all the AMD lovers? 9-inch, MMM, etc I am sure they don't want to see his post nor the article from toms. They probably think Intel is paying Tomshardware to write that post lol...
I'm very taken aback by this immense processor battle. I think it's the toughest it's been in years. However, I'd still like to go with AMD because I think those CPUs overclock better.
Ya so... now it is a waiting game to see what the amd fanatics/zealots will try to bring up to refute this. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :roll: :roll: :roll: