Gaming Monitor = Pure PR ?

XAKEP

Distinguished
Dec 16, 2008
343
0
18,810
Hi guys let me begin with this. Following is my personal experience and it could be from misguided expectations or simply incorrect usage of hardware (totally possible) but it is what it is and I have to talk about it.

Last Christmas I got a gaming monitor ASUS PG278Q. Even before purchasing I knew (I freaken KNEW) what TN and IPS is and some other standards are and because I had many monitors before I have pretty good understanding of what good monitor is and how it should "look" like. But this time around for some reason I decided to take a dive into unknown.

In my mind I really thought after looking at many reviews saying this is best TN there is and it's almost like IPS and G-Sync is amazing and .... basically this PR on this unit got me.

Just FYI before I had NEC EA244WMMi triple setup and I simply love them (still do I still using them) and after unpacking and looking at this Gaming PG278Q I almost lost it. I mean colors and viewing angles are really big downgrade but I said to myself this is TN, just wait to see gaming performance and this G-sync thing that will make everything super smooth and nice.

Guys I have this monitor for like 6 months now, I still can't figure out what a hell this G-Sync does. I mean other than having it on in Nvidia control Panel and having this red light on the bottom I have nothing to even see that it;s indeed working. What does it do again ? I mean for real, is there a application that will kinda do this 3D roughing so I can manually turn on and off G-Sync to see what exactly does it do because in the game I don't see it. I mean I tried to turn in off , then on , when on full screen only, then full and window. I don't see any difference. Like at all.

In my head I though G-Sync will make my gaming experience smooth , don't get me wrong I am on Dual GTX 980 (not ti) with 5930k CPU so it's pretty high end system, but having this smoothing out vs not having g-sync, I simply don't see it in ANY games. I wonder may be it's not working or I am doing something wrong or like I said before I expected too much ?

I'll tell you this much. my wonderful NEC with IPS panel and (I think) 6ms latency vs this 1ms and 144 refresh rate (I don't even get that on my dual 980 so who cares about 144 , unless you downgrade graphics) I have to say that 1ms thing ... I don't see it ... liek at all, and G-Sync, damn thing looks Identical on both monitors, yes NEC Capping at 60 fps but even at mid 80s on ASUS I do not see a thing that I can say with confidence YES I see a difference.

Can anyone put me in to the right direction about having G-Sync tested, like on/off "THERE! YOU SEE THAT'S WHY YOU SPEND$800 dollars !"

Because honestly I feel like a dummy with 1ms vs (I think it's 6ms min and 14ms max) I see nothing even in FPS games, G-Sync is a shame I don't see it and flickering ..... WHAT FLICKERING ? And I am not even talking about colors or viewing angels.

P.S.

After looking at my NEC monitor I kinda remember it's not low and but it's certainly not high-end it's about $400 when I got it and it's like more for business and stuff than gaming but colors are amazing on it. I feel like an idiot again after looking at NEW IPS Gaming Monitors by Acer and ASUS because I again think oh this IPS panel is great and totally worth $850 .....
 
Heres what i think, the term gaming monitor isn't just PR. There are actual differences.

However, it depends which monitor you get. I have a 144hz 1080p ASUS (not ROG). I got it for a reasonable price and i am very happy with it.

The problem in my opinion, is the sub divisons of big companies such as ROG from ASUS which slap a fancy logo on a monitor and charge much more than is necessary. Here is an example. (CAD prices)

I just found this 1080p monitor from ROG. It is 559.96 CAD. http://www.staples.ca/en/ASUS-ROG-Swift-PG248Q-24-inch-TN-eSports-Gaming-Monitor-1920-x/product_2446450_2-CA_1_20001?kpid=2446450&cid=PS:SBD:GS:n:n:SBD:58:21800&cvosrc=PLA.google-CA.Laptop&DesktopComputers&cvo_cid=323578936&cvo_crid=47003050096&prof=58&camp=41483&affcode=pg289869&kct=google&kchid=5118821699&cid=47003050096&networkType=search&kdv=c&kpid=2446450&kmc=10327878&criteriaid=pla-276245965894&adgroupid=14743107016&campaignid=323578936&locphy=9001604&adpos=1o1&url=http://clickserve.dartsearch.net/link/click?lid=92700011712274349&gclid=Cj0KEQjw2fLGBRDopP-vg7PLgvsBEiQAUOnIXKft_C25p-A0lY760saaDLeUoAgxH2UvNdseiDRIiI0aAjne8P8HAQ

This monitor, not ROG. But still from ASUS. Is 370. I have this one. https://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236313

The price difference is in the hundreds and the differences certainly arent worth it in my opinion. Sure the more expensive option has a 180hz refresh rate but lets be honest, if you arent playing esports titles why does that matter?

As for the response time marketing (ms). I think its a bunch of crap. People actually have trouble deciding between 1-5 ms? You cant even tell the difference.

Just my thoughts 😀

NOTE: I gamed on a Phillips office monitor from 2006 for a year when i first got my pc and the resolution was 1920 x 1200 and the response was 7 ms. I like games such as arma and gtav (typical shooters) and there was literally 0 performance increase skill-wise after i got the new ASUS.
 
This may be a good video to watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzHxhjcE0eQ

Along with the explanation of what Gsync is doing:

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/technology/g-sync

A mix of settings (which can vary by game/application), is usually necessary to get the most out of it. Input lag is sometimes really hard to catch unless you're doing side-by-sides with a fast paced racer or spinning L/R quickly in a FPS (not really 'normal' FPS game-play though). Adaptive sync is more noticeable with variable frames in the 35-60 range however, so if you were able to lock 60 with your SLI rig before.....you may not see much of a difference unless you (again) are doing side-by-sides with high detail settings to push down your output.

TN vs IPS is just like adaptive sync and lag in some regards; everyone has different sensitivities and perceives the experience/visuals differently. That said, I can very much understand how going from a good IPS panel to a TN panel would be a jarring experience. Having triples makes IPS a must, so would be hard to get un-used to it as your main screen again, I'm sure.