Leaked screenshots allegedly show the GeForce RTX 4090's peak power consumption.
GeForce RTX 4090 Reportedly Peaks at 493W to Hit 3.1 GHz : Read more
GeForce RTX 4090 Reportedly Peaks at 493W to Hit 3.1 GHz : Read more
It's getting to a point where the GPU will need to be housed in a separate case just for the GPU as its unfair to the rest of the pc components to have to put up with getting roasted in a hot box.
There...the next big thing in PC enthusiast hyper-market...the nVidiaGBOX. you read it here first 😎
All they need is about 10 USB portsSoon a video card won't be an accessory that slots into a motherboard, soon the motherboard will be the accessory.
There are definitely changes to the design, though superficially the 4090 FE looks like the 3090 FE:Am I the only one who can't get over the exact same look? I mean, no changes at all to the color scheme or design is kind of weird to me. I know it is minor and I don't usually care but man, just nothing is odd.
There was no chiller used for this test. Minimum temperature was measured at 40C. If a chiller was used, that should be in single digits. The 4090 FE reportedly runs at about 50-55C under load.It's worth noting that neither of those screenshots were tested at ambient temperatures. Those are chilled loop temperatures. Nothing too crazy, but don't expect to see anything similar out of the box.
Semantics, but as the article that was linked to states, it's a recommended PSU wattage. A 450W GPU can't require a 1,200W or it wouldn't be a 450W GPU. If they factor overclock it, then they should provide the power required for what that is so that people can make the appropriate calculations for themselves instead of just throwing out some random number that means nothing without the context of the other parts involved.Some over-engineered custom models, which sport heavy factory overclocks, require a 1,200W power supply
Soon a video card won't be an accessory that slots into a motherboard, soon the motherboard will be the accessory.
A 450W GPU doesn't always draw 450W. Nvidia's power limit is an average over time so it doesn't even really matter if the card has a higher power limit. The recommendation is just in case a lower wattage PSU can't handle high transient power draw. Samsung 8nm was so bad that Asus measured 3090 peak power draw at 940W. They're probably being extra cautious.Semantics, but as the article that was linked to states, it's a recommended PSU wattage. A 450W GPU can't require a 1,200W or it wouldn't be a 450W GPU. If they factor overclock it, then they should provide the power required for what that is so that people can make the appropriate calculations for themselves instead of just throwing out some random number that means nothing without the context of the other parts involved.
It's getting to a point where the GPU will need to be housed in a separate case just for the GPU as its unfair to the rest of the pc components to have to put up with getting roasted in a hot box.
There...the next big thing in PC enthusiast hyper-market...the nVidiaGBOX. you read it here first 😎
Well, those countries have bigger issues than playing video games! Get out and take your country back!Wow, you need a 500w GPU to play games?? That's not free at all. Energy prices are going through the roof. Some countries may not even have sufficient energy for this winter and this is a 500w gpu...
If price and power bother you, then buy a console
and what if the consoles have no games a person wants to play ? then what ?
many people go the " well buy a console " route, but i wonder if they even consider the games a person plays. most of the games i play are on my Comp. only a few are on the consoles i do have ( and i dont own the PS5, switch or newest xbox ) IF i were to get a console it would be a Switch, as between PS and Xbox, there are maybe 5 games between those 2 that i would play last time i checked.
is not which genre, is the games them self.Because just about every genre is available on the next gen consoles
the same can be said about a console. would you spend 500+ on a console for only 2-3 games ? i sure wouldnt. id rather spend that on a vid card. at least i could play the games i play, as well as other things that the comp can do, which a console cant.So to spend that kind of money to play a few games is a waste
actually the top end vid cards do interest me, its the prices that dontSo the “4090” itself shouldn’t really interest you
There are definitely changes to the design, though superficially the 4090 FE looks like the 3090 FE:
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-rtx-4090-unboxing
It's a bit thicker, not quite as long, same height, same weight. There's a slight "curve" to the silver/gray casing on the 4090.
Not every generation gets a full reworking of the GPU design. GTX 680, 780, 980, and 1080 were all similar blower designs, with modest updates to the fans, fins, etc. It's only 20-series (complete new design) and 30-series (another design overhaul) that really changed things. I do have to say, I think one of the major reasons for Nvidia's 30-series (and now 40-series) Founders Edition designs was just to move one of the fans to the opposite side of the card to reduce measured noise in testing. I always find the exterior of the 30-series cards get VERY got while under load.
That's to be expected when you have the likes if Greta Thunberg directing your country's energy policies.Wow, you need a 500w GPU to play games?? That's not free at all. Energy prices are going through the roof. Some countries may not even have sufficient energy for this winter and this is a 500w gpu...