xxsk8er101xx
Splendid
stupid it's a sarcastic remark
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/mysystemrig.html?id=9933" target="_new"> My Rig </A>
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/mysystemrig.html?id=9933" target="_new"> My Rig </A>
ok, at least you're not stupid and can look things up ...
you can't see a sarcastic remark when you see one only tells me you are quite naive.
point of view or lack of true information. Most of us learned evolution in school so we believe it, most Muslims learned creation so they believe it. In reality it not proven either way - evelution is just a theory and pepole who believe in creation don't really know how god did it.
unlike a cold, selfish, bigot like yourself i don't dislike or hate anyone here or anywhere for that matter as i don't know any of you people.
What?!? No jobs for philosophers...think again. Where do you think quickie marts and retail counters get their hires from?There are no jobs for philosophers outside of the university. I don't think there are any philosophical think-tanks.
That's bold! Even a blind squirrel gets a nut sometimes. Loafers, sorry, PHILOSOPHERS, do nothing but argue and spue conjecture several times per day....one of those idiotic statements was bound to be true......what about the other 49,546,028,109,198,028,930 pieces of crap that they have suggested? Dude, I'm a biologist by trade, and I hardly conclude that philosphy is the "basic fabric of science". If philosophers weren't so freakin' lazy they would try to prove some of the ridiculous statements they make...but that would be work, and that would be beneath a philosopher, wouldn't it?It is philosphy that discovered the atom over 2000 years ago for your information.
I guess what we have here is a poor understanding of the word prove (courtesy of dictionary.com):evolution is not 99% proven it is more like 30%(but scientist don't have any other ideas so this is the "most" true to them) . I think if you had an open mind you could "prove" either theory. A thousand years ago you could "prove" the earth is flat, who knows how our thinking will change as new thinks are found out? ( one interesting thing is that the bible says that the earth is a "sphere or circle hanging on nothing" in the book of Job thousands of years before it was "proved").
I would like to think that evolution is more than 30% proved, given that the fossil line aggregates overwhelmingly conclusive evidence that certain animals have overwhelmingly similar characteristics of their predecessors and future generations. Certain homologous body parts (of many different species -- forelimbs of unguligrades vs. wings of birds) have very different phenotypic expressions, but, upon closer examination, we can see they are not so different after all. When the fossil record is closely examined, you can see a gradual transition from one manifestation to another. I am not saying that there aren;t huge gaps in the fossil record (e.g. - the missing link), but scientists are resolved to find that answer. They have made some bold (BUT REASONABLE) assumptions, and would gladly reject these should someone come up with a more plausible explanation, OR, irrefutable evidence that contradicts previous beliefs. The point being, that science is not blindly inflexible, as are religions, especially zealots, who mistakenly believe their way is the only way.prove Pronunciation Key (prv)
v. proved, proved, or prov·en (prvn) prov·ing, proves
v. tr.
To establish the truth or validity of by presentation of argument or evidence.
Law. To establish the authenticity of (a will).
To determine the quality of by testing; try out.
"And he wonders why no one likes him here."
And how necessary was that? I only attacked as you have.
If you were at all not what i have labeled you you would end it, as this is meaningless.