Review Gigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X motherboard review: Striking in white, with lots of USB

HideOut

Distinguished
Dec 24, 2005
613
108
19,170
$330 for ALC 897 audio? thats a JOKE! My 2.5 year old AMD 5900X system has a newer codec than that, on a board that was $132.49 WITH 2.5G ethernet and all. I know inflation blah blah blah, but this what, 2.7X more or something? Its pathetic. But hey, THG gets a cut if you buy this "bargain" pile from their link
 

35below0

Respectable
Jan 3, 2024
1,727
744
2,090
$330 for ALC 897 audio? thats a JOKE! My 2.5 year old AMD 5900X system has a newer codec than that, on a board that was $132.49 WITH 2.5G ethernet and all. I know inflation blah blah blah, but this what, 2.7X more or something? Its pathetic. But hey, THG gets a cut if you buy this "bargain" pile from their link
Who gives a rat's ass about the audio codec though? The other features pointed out are the draw.
Audio components are kinda meh all the way to the top end Gigabyte boards anyway.

Granted, it would be nice if it were better, but i don't think a professional would be any happier with a slightly better (less crap) codec. And non-professionals will either not care or will happily step up to a higher end model to get what this board offers *and* more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sleepy_Hollowed

Notton

Commendable
Dec 29, 2023
873
769
1,260
I'm not too into audio, but don't they all skip the onboard audio when you send the sound through HDMI, AptX-LL enabled BT, or 2.4Ghz wireless?

Like, if you care about audio so much, why not spend a little bit on a HDMI/USB DAC, or HDMI audio splitter?
I'm sure they are better EMI shielded than mobo audio too.
 

Sleepy_Hollowed

Distinguished
Jan 1, 2017
536
236
19,270
If I was buying this for audio, I'd just slide a pcie card and not touch the integrated one.

I have not used my on board card for a long time since I either use a USB DAC or a pci-e (not so much recently though) card if I need to get the CPU load out of the equation for audio..
 

Aurn

Reputable
Jun 26, 2021
16
18
4,515
I'm not too into audio, but don't they all skip the onboard audio when you send the sound through HDMI, AptX-LL enabled BT, or 2.4Ghz wireless?

Like, if you care about audio so much, why not spend a little bit on a HDMI/USB DAC, or HDMI audio splitter?
I'm sure they are better EMI shielded than mobo audio too.

From what I found, you are correct, in the case of wireless speakers or headphones, the onboard audio is bypassed, so its quality does not matter. (And same in the case of HDMI.) But not everyone has or wants to use wireless speakers. I still use my 21-year old Creative speakers, which need the rear audio jack (black colour) and I’d rather not add yet another external peripheral (external sound card in this case). I just don’t like this trend of new mainboards skimping on audio quality and ports at the same time when you already don’t have much room for extra PCIe cards because graphics cards are thick. I’m glad I got the MSI B650 Tomahawk WiFi when I changed PCs in October ; it has noticeably better audio than my previous ASRock X370 Taichi and still has five audio jacks and optical output
 
Last edited:
Mar 11, 2024
14
4
15
Typos in the "test system components" table, unless the testers did manage to fit an Intel 13900K into an AM5 motherboard?

I've owned this motherboard since before Xmas (imported via NewEgg), so I may have had the first one in the UK.
I can cofirm the retail box includes all the usual bits (WiFi antenna, SATA cables, etc), but the manual has to be downloaded.
 
Last edited:
For anyone looking at this motherboard for use with the 9000 series it works quite well. I had to update my BIOS using Q-Flash Plus to support the 9000 series but once that was done it works with 6400MHz Team T-Create Expert RAM without any IF offset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WonkoTheSaneUK