You can't just look at a screen shot and judge and entire desktop shell, you have to actually TRY it. Which is the nice thing about Gnome 3, you can actually go download it and TRY it. Plop it in a virtual machine using VirtualBox, Vmware, Virtual PC, whatever and play with it for five minutes. The screenshot is just one aspect of the shell, and the only time there is ever clutter. This is the application pane where you can open an app or find one on one of unlimited workspaces. It's awesome on a laptop, but not so much on a multi-display setup. It's very different from the 16 year old "Start" button format that Microsoft refuses to let go of and has left Windows 7 nothing more than a "blah" desktop experience (really, I know people who have REVERTED to VISTA for crying out loud!). If Microsoft really wanted to spice up their desktop they would take some cues from one of their existing UI's the Xbox 360 dashboard. I do agree though that Linux is traditionally a strong server OS, but Gnome 3 is a strong step towards streamlining the linux desktop experience. KDE 4.62 isn't half bad either. And Linux users MIGHT be getting what they paid for, but Windows users, ask yourselves, are you getting what YOU paid for? There is a place for Windows (like inside a Linux KVM for XP compatibility mode, thanks MS for the idea!) But really, use what you like, if you're happy with Windows, use it, but if you want something fully customizable, and of course free, give Linux a try.