GTX 1080 extremely low GPU usage (35%~60%)

Nanookie

Reputable
Jul 25, 2015
25
0
4,530
Before I get into any details:
I am aware that my computer is experiencing CPU bottleneck. At the time I built it, I spent several hours on tech forums, researching for what CPUs would bottleneck the GTX 1080. After reading that "any newer generation i5 won't cause bottleneck" on several threads, I decided to buy the GPU, only to find out that they were wrong.
My rig is very unbalanced, but here it is:

GPU: MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G
CPU: i5 6600 3,3 GHz
CPU Cooler: Stock
RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 8GB DDR3 1600MHz (Dual Channel)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-GAMING 3 DDR3
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SSD + Seagate 1TB HDD
PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W
Case: NZXT Noctis 450
Monitor: MG248Q 1080p @144Hz

Ok, so I built my computer aimed at 144Hz gaming with decent graphics. I watched numerous benchmark videos where Battlefield 4 was playing at constant 150+ FPS on 1080p, Ultra, even with a worse CPU than mine. But in my case, this is what I'm getting:
Battlefield 4:
1080p, Ultra, 100% Resolution Scale - 80~120FPS (GPU usage at ~45%/CPU usage at ~100%)
1080p, Ultra, 200% Resolution Scale - 50~90FPS (GPU usage at ~65%/CPU usage at ~100%)
1080p, Low, 100% Resolution Scale - 110~240FPS (GPU usage at ~35%/CPU usage at ~100%)
1080p, Low, 200% Resolution Scale - 100~140FPS (GPU usage at ~45%/CPU usage at ~100%)


Battlefield 1:
*(constant FPS drops)
1080p, Ultra, 100% Resolution Scale - 40~80FPS (GPU usage at ~40%/CPU usage at ~100%)
1080p, Ultra, 200% Resolution Scale - 40~70FPS (GPU usage at ~55%/CPU usage at ~100%)
1080p, Low, 100% Resolution Scale - 70~110FPS (GPU usage at ~35%/CPU usage at ~100%)
1080p, Low, 200% Resolution Scale - 70~100FPS (GPU usage at ~50%/CPU usage at ~100%)

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege:
*(I can't even play this game. My mouse suffer terrible stuttering. It's like I'm constantly changing DPI. What I did that kind of solved the problem, was playing it at 4K, with V-Sync on.)
I haven't benchmarked this game in a while, but from what I remember, I get around 70~120FPS at 1080p. Graphic settings won't change the FPS much. GPU usage was never above 50%, but CPU usage was at constant 100%.

Overwatch:
1080p, Epic, 100% Resolution Scale - 80~120FPS
1080p, Low, 100% Resolution Scale - 120~180FPS
I haven't benchmarked it since I constantly play this game at ~144FPS.

I've searched for possible fixes to this since may, but none of what I read solved my problem.
I already installed DDU and clean installed the GPU's driver, but it changed nothing. I also tried setting Power Management Mode to "Prefer Maximum Performance" and Maximum Pre-rendered Frames to 1, but I didn't notice any improvement. I feel like my only scape is to buy a decent i7, but I have no money at the moment and I live in Brazil (I payed 300USD for my CPU and around 1200USD for my GPU).

What I'm asking for is possible solutions I haven't tried yet (that do not involve money, of course) until I can afford a new CPU. I need to be sure about what is the core of the problem. Some people said it is my RAM, other said CPU and even PSU.

I am desperate. Send help.
 
I had the same issue with my i5-3570k overclocked to 4.5ghz....

I have build a new pc with a 6800k and it solved the problem, I have gained 30+ fps in some games ( BF4 at 1440p).

Nividia recommends a i7 with tthe GTX 1080, so if you play a game that is CPU intensive (multipayer games like BF4 and BF1) your i5 will get 100% usage and you ll get fps drops and stuttering.

If you get get your hand on i7 6700k, do it.
 
Not sure where the general mindset has come from that you buy a 144 Hz monitor is for the expectation of playing 144+ fps. You want to get 144 hz with the expectation of playing > 60 fps and < 143 fps. Basically, the best thing that 144hz does for you is let you use ULMB at 100 hz

The 77700k is the fastest CPU available on the current platform and Average Frame Rated don't differ much so not seeing this "bottleneck".

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1646?vs=1826

(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4G w/ 6600 @ 1080p Ultra = 97.14 fps
(Win 7) Shadow of Mordor on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4G w/ 7700k @ 1080p Ultra = 98.11
I can't really call the loss of 1% in frame rates a "serious bottleneck".

(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB w/ 6600 @ 1080p Ultra = 168.13
(Win 7) GRID: Autosport on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB w/ 7700k @ 1080p Ultra = 172.9
Again, the loss of 2.8% in frame rates would not qualify as a "serious bottleneck".

(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB w/ 6600 @ 1080p Ultra = 71.42
(Win 7) Grand Theft Auto V on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB w/ 7700k @ 1080p Ultra = 74.32
Loss of 3.9%.

(Win 7) Total War: Attila on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB w/ 6600 @ 1080p Ultra = 35.23
(Win 7) Total War: Attila on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB w/ 6600 @ 1080p Ultra = 36.00
Loss of 2.2%

(Win 7) Alien Isolation on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB Strix 4GB w/ 6600 @ 1080p Ultra = 177.42
(Win 7) Alien Isolation on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB Strix 4GB w/ 6600 @ 1080p Ultra = 179.00
Loss of 0.9%

So I just don't see the a return on investment replacing a MoBo / CPU for a gain of 0.9 to 3.9% increase in average fps.
 

I understand what you are saying, but a GTX 1080 + 6600 just isn't the same as a GTX 980 + 6600 combo.
Taking what you said into consideration, what would be my solution then?
 

Then what would be appropriate for 1080p 144Hz?
 


Yeah, I have. It is a bottleneck 100%.
But I feel like I can't rely on my own tests. I just played BF1 @4K, Ultra and my GPU peaked 99% usage.
 

TRENDING THREADS