Hi folks,
I'm looking for advice here. I am currently building my new machine and am trying to decide what to do for my graphics cards. I am considering one of two options: two GTX680 4GB cards or two GTX690 4GB cards. I understand that the two cards are both great for different things, and my concern is the amount of available vRAM on the GTX690, which is really only 2GB per card since it is simply two 2GB 680s in SLI, so even with two 690s, which would be quad-SLI, it is still only 2GB of available vRAM... Where as each single GTX680 4GB actually has 4GB of available vRAM.
I'd like to get some thoughts, opinions, and recommendations on which solution is best for long term, all-around performance with every different type of graphically intense environment. I've seen many recommendations for the 690 in various situations such as use on multiple high resolution displays, and many recommendations for the 680 4GB in other environments. I'll try to be as clear as I can: I want to know which is better, keeping in mind I will be using two of each card, for ultimate performance in every possible environment. Should I go with two GTX680 4GB cards in SLI, keeping a total vRAM of 4GB, or should I go with two GTX690s which would ultimately be quad-SLI but still only 2GB of available vRAM but theoretically better performance on higher resolution screens. I know it's a tall order to determine which is best since they're both great at different things, but if I were to say I need the best card for all situations possible, which would be the better choice? If it is apples and oranges and what I'm asking for simply doesn't exist, let me know and I'll wait for nvidia to develop a true 4GB vRAM 690.
Thanks for any advice! The details of my setup are below.
Cheers!
PURCHASE DATE: February 2013
BUDGET RANGE: Unlimited
USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: Gaming (Many graphically intense games and FPS's), used on Asus 2560x1440 display, gaming capture card streaming, video editing and streaming, photo design and editing , watching movies
CURRENT GPU AND POWER SUPPLY:
- Power Supply: Corsair AX1200i
- Current GPU: N/A
OTHER RELEVANT SYSTEM SPECS:
- Motherboard: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
- CPU: Intel Core i7-3970x [Six Core]
- CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H100i Extreme Performance
- Memory: Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR3-2133 (8x8GB)
- Storage: 4x Corsair Force GT 480GB SSD in RAID 0 [1920GB]
- Case: NZXT Phantom 820
PREFERRED WEBSITE(S) FOR PARTS: No preference but with shipping to Canada.
PARTS PREFERENCES: Must be ASUS only, and I am not considering anything other than two GTX 680 4GB or two GTX 690 4GB.
OVERCLOCKING: Yes
SLI: Yes
MONITOR RESOLUTION: 2560x1440 (Primary)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Please see above.
------------
EDIT: Looks like I am going to wait and see what nvidia announces with the upcoming titan card and when it will be available and likely will wait it out and go with that. If not, I'll do the tri-SLI with three GTX 680 4GB cards. Thanks to all for the advice!
I'm looking for advice here. I am currently building my new machine and am trying to decide what to do for my graphics cards. I am considering one of two options: two GTX680 4GB cards or two GTX690 4GB cards. I understand that the two cards are both great for different things, and my concern is the amount of available vRAM on the GTX690, which is really only 2GB per card since it is simply two 2GB 680s in SLI, so even with two 690s, which would be quad-SLI, it is still only 2GB of available vRAM... Where as each single GTX680 4GB actually has 4GB of available vRAM.
I'd like to get some thoughts, opinions, and recommendations on which solution is best for long term, all-around performance with every different type of graphically intense environment. I've seen many recommendations for the 690 in various situations such as use on multiple high resolution displays, and many recommendations for the 680 4GB in other environments. I'll try to be as clear as I can: I want to know which is better, keeping in mind I will be using two of each card, for ultimate performance in every possible environment. Should I go with two GTX680 4GB cards in SLI, keeping a total vRAM of 4GB, or should I go with two GTX690s which would ultimately be quad-SLI but still only 2GB of available vRAM but theoretically better performance on higher resolution screens. I know it's a tall order to determine which is best since they're both great at different things, but if I were to say I need the best card for all situations possible, which would be the better choice? If it is apples and oranges and what I'm asking for simply doesn't exist, let me know and I'll wait for nvidia to develop a true 4GB vRAM 690.
Thanks for any advice! The details of my setup are below.
Cheers!
PURCHASE DATE: February 2013
BUDGET RANGE: Unlimited
USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: Gaming (Many graphically intense games and FPS's), used on Asus 2560x1440 display, gaming capture card streaming, video editing and streaming, photo design and editing , watching movies
CURRENT GPU AND POWER SUPPLY:
- Power Supply: Corsair AX1200i
- Current GPU: N/A
OTHER RELEVANT SYSTEM SPECS:
- Motherboard: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
- CPU: Intel Core i7-3970x [Six Core]
- CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H100i Extreme Performance
- Memory: Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR3-2133 (8x8GB)
- Storage: 4x Corsair Force GT 480GB SSD in RAID 0 [1920GB]
- Case: NZXT Phantom 820
PREFERRED WEBSITE(S) FOR PARTS: No preference but with shipping to Canada.
PARTS PREFERENCES: Must be ASUS only, and I am not considering anything other than two GTX 680 4GB or two GTX 690 4GB.
OVERCLOCKING: Yes
SLI: Yes
MONITOR RESOLUTION: 2560x1440 (Primary)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Please see above.
------------
EDIT: Looks like I am going to wait and see what nvidia announces with the upcoming titan card and when it will be available and likely will wait it out and go with that. If not, I'll do the tri-SLI with three GTX 680 4GB cards. Thanks to all for the advice!