GTX 960 + Good PC or GTX 970 + Worse PC?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TorterraX

Distinguished
May 23, 2016
47
1
18,535
Hey guys! :p

I'm getting my new PC build done, but I'm facing a new dilemma. Looking at reviews and benchmarks I see that the performance gap between the gtx 970 and 960 is pretty big. Unfortunately, I'm kind of on a budget so unless money magically appears in my wallet, which I doubt will happen, I can't put that extra 130$ CAD.

So my question is, on the following build, would it be better to swap the 960 for a 970 and cut elsewhere? I'm planning to play games such as The Witcher, No Man's Sky, Mass Effect Andromeda, etc.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Core i5-6600K 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor ($304.55 @ Vuugo)
CPU Cooler: CRYORIG H7 49.0 CFM CPU Cooler ($45.00)
Thermal Compound: Arctic Silver 5 High-Density Polysynthetic Silver 3.5g Thermal Paste ($6.99 @ NCIX)
Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($193.74 @ Newegg Canada)
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory ($85.82 @ DirectCanada)
Storage: Sandisk SSD PLUS 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (Purchased For $90.00)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (Purchased For $60.00)
Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 960 4GB SuperSC ACX 2.0+ Video Card ($269.99 @ Memory Express)
Case: Fractal Design Define S w/Window ATX Mid Tower Case ($109.99 @ NCIX)
Case Fan: Corsair Air Series AF120 Quiet Edition (2-Pack) 39.9 CFM 120mm Fans ($29.97 @ DirectCanada)
Other: Orion 685W Silent 80+ Bronze (Purchased For $59.00)
Total: $1255.05
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-07-16 18:27 EDT-0400

If I choose the 970, I could swap the 6600k for a 6500, and the mobo for a z170-e or b/h150 or something else, but then I'd have to downgrade RAM too.

So, what do you guys think would be better?
Thanks!

TorterraX
 
Solution


There is not much difference in most DX11 games. Rarely did hyperthreading impact performance positively in the past few years except if it was like an i3 vs a Pentium comparison. Most games just weren't...

TorterraX

Distinguished
May 23, 2016
47
1
18,535


No no no, I know what it means and that's not what I meant at all :p I just meant that 60 FPS is plenty anyway, so going over that is a bit overkill since I'm gonna have to sell my house to afford a good 144 Hz monitor :p What I was saying is that you need at least 120 Hz to play 3D (as in 3d goggles) games to have 60Hz for each eye , but I don't have any of those games :)
 

Epicness937

Honorable
BANNED


uh ok?
can you teach me this one im here to help but i honestly i have no idea what your talking about
 

TorterraX

Distinguished
May 23, 2016
47
1
18,535


Hahahaha well I'm no expert but from what I read, since the refresh rate is the number of times the monitor's image is gonna change in one second, it obviously dictates how many maximum FPS it can show. So as you said, a 60Hz monitor can go up to 60 FPS, a 120 Hz one goes to 120, etc. But for 3D games, that is different (again, I'm on pretty slippery terrain here, so take this with a grain of salt). When running 3D games, the monitor and the PC need to process 2 images at the same time to achieve the 3d effect, just like it would with a movie. So since the number of images is doubled, the monitor needs to be at least a 120Hz to get to 60 FPS for both images - for a total of 120. Does that make sense?

So, I don't see the point in getting over 60 FPS when playing, and I don't plan to play any 3D games, that's why I won't go over 60Hz for my monitor, especially as it's expensive :p