Question gtx1080 ti

[Darren35]

been overclocking my gtx1080ti with msi afterburner and I just wanted to know your thoughts on this overclock .
+165 core clock
+550 memory clock
Heaven benchmark results FPS 96.2 score 2423 , FPS min 33.3 max 199.6 ultra setting 2k.

I didn't know this card could be push that much , seems stable I can push it more but it seems to lower the score. ill do some more testing in game.

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

Which 1080 Ti?

 

[Phaaze88]

Well, it's a little better than mine of 164 core/370 memory.
https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/192079/gigabyte-gtx1080ti-11264-170328
It's just a reference card with a better cooler. Next time, I'll get a higher end model with a higher than stock power limit, so I can push it further.

 

[Darren35]

Mine is Inno 3d twin fan but I have installed an AIO on it , Temps are really good .

 

[Darren35]

Do you have any test results? . I found I could push mine more without it crashing but it lowered the FPS results, so I backed off both core and memory and it gave me higher FPS.

 

[Darren35]

Just got the score rating a bit higher , Is this score rating good I am still new to overclocking but this is my 3rd try on overclocking gpu. res 2560x1440

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

Unigine Heaven isn't good for comparing scores from different systems; there are too many variable settings in it. Use a standard benchmark like 3DMark FireStrike or TimeSpy.

 

[Phaaze88]

Do you have any test results? . I found I could push mine more without it crashing but it lowered the FPS results, so I backed off both core and memory and it gave me higher FPS.

I can post some a little later.
I COULD do +400 memory, but it'll pass a Realbench 8hr ST, but crash in UH if run overnight... so, it's not stable.
And some games just don't like manually OC'd cards. I play one such indie title, Redout Enhanced. Literally NOTHING(DDU, new driver/older driver, etc.) works, except leaving the card at stock and raising the power limit to max.

Unigine Heaven isn't good for comparing scores from different systems; there are too many variable settings in it. Use a standard benchmark like 3DMark FireStrike or TimeSpy.

News to me, but I'll try it out.

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

News to me, but I'll try it out.

If you have the same settings it's not bad. But look at his resolution.. it's in windows mode at 2560x1431. Custom preset. It's just not good for comparing scores across systems.

 

[Darren35]

Just downloaded the demo to try this is the results , didn't crash but I don't know if theses results are good .

 

[Phaaze88]

You should run Fire Strike as well. Time Spy is for DX12, Fire Strike is DX11.
I don't want to post a large window, so I'll just link mine:
-Time Spy: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/39614087
-Fire Strike: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/39614243

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

Just downloaded the demo to try this is the results , didn't crash but I don't know if theses results are good .

Your graphics score is higher than @Phaaze88. Looks good from that perspective.

 

[Darren35]

I was wondering is it ok for the CPU score to be much lower than the graphics score like mine is , I overclock my Ryzen 2600 to 4.0ghz so I think that's about the limit I could go to on mine .

 

[Phaaze88]

I was wondering is it ok for the CPU score to be much lower than the graphics score like mine is , I overclock my Ryzen 2600 to 4.0ghz so I think that's about the limit I could go to on mine .

It's not overheating?
Running dual channel?
You didn't have too many background processes using up cpu resources at the time?

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

I was wondering is it ok for the CPU score to be much lower than the graphics score like mine is , I overclock my Ryzen 2600 to 4.0ghz so I think that's about the limit I could go to on mine .

Seems like it could be a little higher, but it doesn't look abnormal since it is higher than a stock score. Again though, seems like it could be a little higher.