"hacktivists"? really? slap on a picture of ppl wearing guy fawkes masks like other clueless media outlets and clueless media consumers will infer that anonymous (which also champions many good causes btw) are criminals (inherently bad). pretty irresponsible "marketing-journalism" if you ask me. did you check your sources? or explain exactly how those numbers were derived to show more fact than sensationalism?
your government can point to these "stories" to justify eroding your civil liberties and begin censoring the internet for YOUR protection.
how about a story about government and corporations peddling your personal information "legally" to avoid paying for marketing research to 'better serve their consumers'.