G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)
JoeSmooth wrote:
> During the 1960's in the US, the government, feeling threatened by the
> counter culture tried to crack down on drug use, specifically
> marijuana. (see "reefer madness") They lauched an add campaign
> showing (among other things) that people who smoked pot would actualy
> go insane. Well, what happened of course is that people smoked weed
> anyway (for whatever reason) and surprise surprise, they didn't go
> insane. Even though long term studies show that chronic marijuana
> use can be detrimental, and even though there is a moderate element
> of psychological addiction and other short term detrimental effects,
> this information was never conveyed because the governement was
> over-the-top in their anti-drug message and so lost all credibility.
You know an analogy like this will fly over difool's head.
JoeSmooth wrote:
> During the 1960's in the US, the government, feeling threatened by the
> counter culture tried to crack down on drug use, specifically
> marijuana. (see "reefer madness") They lauched an add campaign
> showing (among other things) that people who smoked pot would actualy
> go insane. Well, what happened of course is that people smoked weed
> anyway (for whatever reason) and surprise surprise, they didn't go
> insane. Even though long term studies show that chronic marijuana
> use can be detrimental, and even though there is a moderate element
> of psychological addiction and other short term detrimental effects,
> this information was never conveyed because the governement was
> over-the-top in their anti-drug message and so lost all credibility.
You know an analogy like this will fly over difool's head.