OK, So... My current hard drives are nearing the end of their lives [60gb Maxtor ATA-100; 120GB Maxtor ATA-100] and I'm looking to replace them. I have been studying the Hard Disk Charts, and even with their support, I am undecided upon what hard drives I need.
Here is what I am considering getting at this time:
1x Hitachi GTS DeskStar 7K500
->Primary Hard Drive [500gb]
->Chosen due to awesome results on Windows XP Startup
2x WD2500KS SE16 in RAID 0
->Storage array with two main purposes:
#When recording video with FRAPS, store video to this drive.
#Store and read commonly used CD/DVD Images. [Large, 4gb+ files]
What I am looking for from these drives is two major factors: Fast load speeds in such games as Company of Heroes, Battlefield 2, World of Warcraft, Half Life 2 + Mods; and a secondary drive for storing large files while I am recording in-game footage or mounting a virtual image file via Daemon Tools.
So, Why I chose this layout:
1)I figure that the Windows XP Startup Performance benchmark is as close to an actual real-time, real-application benchmark available; thus, if a drive dominates the windows XP startup performance, then I would imagine it would have similar performance when loading a game such as Company of Heroes or Battlefield 2. Because of this, I chose the drive that clearly dominates the Windows XP startup performance benchmark.
2) The WD2500KS drives look pretty-good in every benchmark I have seen them in, plus only cost about $75/drive. With them I can make a cheap RAID-0 array that seems perfect for this application.
So my ultimate question: Am I doin' it rite?
Seriously though, should I ignore the Hatichi's domination on the XP Performance? What is the best drive for loading games directly off of? Should I replace the 500 with two non-raid 250s, 1 for windows, the other for installing games onto; and use the 2x250 RAID for storing DVD Images? Should I replace the 2x250 RAID with a second 500? Should I use any drives other than the 250s and 500s I have mentioned?
If anyone can answer any of these questions or cares share some helpful information with me, it would really be appreciated...
Thanks!
Here is what I am considering getting at this time:
1x Hitachi GTS DeskStar 7K500
->Primary Hard Drive [500gb]
->Chosen due to awesome results on Windows XP Startup
2x WD2500KS SE16 in RAID 0
->Storage array with two main purposes:
#When recording video with FRAPS, store video to this drive.
#Store and read commonly used CD/DVD Images. [Large, 4gb+ files]
What I am looking for from these drives is two major factors: Fast load speeds in such games as Company of Heroes, Battlefield 2, World of Warcraft, Half Life 2 + Mods; and a secondary drive for storing large files while I am recording in-game footage or mounting a virtual image file via Daemon Tools.
So, Why I chose this layout:
1)I figure that the Windows XP Startup Performance benchmark is as close to an actual real-time, real-application benchmark available; thus, if a drive dominates the windows XP startup performance, then I would imagine it would have similar performance when loading a game such as Company of Heroes or Battlefield 2. Because of this, I chose the drive that clearly dominates the Windows XP startup performance benchmark.
2) The WD2500KS drives look pretty-good in every benchmark I have seen them in, plus only cost about $75/drive. With them I can make a cheap RAID-0 array that seems perfect for this application.
So my ultimate question: Am I doin' it rite?
Seriously though, should I ignore the Hatichi's domination on the XP Performance? What is the best drive for loading games directly off of? Should I replace the 500 with two non-raid 250s, 1 for windows, the other for installing games onto; and use the 2x250 RAID for storing DVD Images? Should I replace the 2x250 RAID with a second 500? Should I use any drives other than the 250s and 500s I have mentioned?
If anyone can answer any of these questions or cares share some helpful information with me, it would really be appreciated...
Thanks!