[SOLVED] Having trouble choosing RAM for my 3950x / x570 build

MoreMoneyThanSense

Reputable
Aug 4, 2019
136
2
4,585
Originally I wanted 64 GB RAM and to have it all be lightning fast but apparently that is difficult to do?

I am mostly debating whether to get more memory 64 GB at the expense of speed, or faster 32 GB at, well, the expense of slightly less RAM.

Is there any serious reason to go with two sticks rather than four? I like how four looks better than two, but from what I hear, two is easier to get working? I'm not quite sure. Would be nice to have four.

The 64 GB options I was considering:
64 GB (4 x 16) 3600 16-16-16-36 https://www.newegg.com/g-skill-64gb-288-pin-ddr4-sdram/p/N82E16820232864
64 GB (4 x 16) 3200 14-14-14-34 https://www.newegg.com/g-skill-64gb-288-pin-ddr4-sdram/p/N82E16820232851

The 32 GB options:
32 GB (4 x 8) 3600 14-15-15-35 https://www.newegg.com/g-skill-32gb-288-pin-ddr4-sdram/p/N82E16820232857
32 GB (4 x 8) 3200 14-14-14-34 https://www.newegg.com/g-skill-32gb-288-pin-ddr4-sdram/p/N82E16820232850

Can anyone help me make sense of these options and how they compare in real-usage terms?
 

Bad_Company

Reputable
Aug 17, 2016
112
13
4,695
What is you use case and need 64 Gb of ram ? No quad channel anyway , and higher speeds with tighter timings will be easier to achieve on 2 dimms. 3600 with cl 14 is pretty good. Apart from the fact that its out of stock though , its also double the price of the 3200.

The most important thing is what you intend to use your computer for.
 

MoreMoneyThanSense

Reputable
Aug 4, 2019
136
2
4,585
What is you use case and need 64 Gb of ram ? No quad channel anyway , and higher speeds with tighter timings will be easier to achieve on 2 dimms. 3600 with cl 14 is pretty good. Apart from the fact that its out of stock though , its also double the price of the 3200.

The most important thing is what you intend to use your computer for.

What do you mean by "no quad channel anyway"?

And is there any major difference when you say "easier to achieve"? If a given speed is achieved on 4 dimms vs. 2, is there any difference?

I intend to use the computer for:

-Gaming
-Programming (various IDEs, some programs resource heavy like Android, others more heavy number-crunchy like Mathematica, also Python, C++, Java, R, SQL, some web stuff, etc)
-Virtual machines
-Streaming
-Photoshop
-Video editing
-3d modeling
-...lots of Chrome tabs

A lot of these things done at the same time, lots of programs open, etc.
 

Bad_Company

Reputable
Aug 17, 2016
112
13
4,695
am4 does not support quad channel. So you will be running the 4 dimms in dual.

And is there any major difference when you say "easier to achieve"? If a given speed is achieved on 4 dimms vs. 2, is there any difference?

If a given speed is achieved on both 4 and 2 dimms, you will be able to run tighter stable timings on the 2 dimm kit. Both out of the box and in case you are interested in fiddling with ram timings and overclocking them.

Technically the fastest of the four choices will be the 3600 cl 14 32 gb kit.
Anyway, apart from synthetics, the real life performance difference will be at best negligible.
Plus i feel how 4 dimms definitely look sexy compared to 2.
 

MoreMoneyThanSense

Reputable
Aug 4, 2019
136
2
4,585
Wait really? I thought AM4 was supposed to be their latest socket? What does support quad channel? Does this mean I am losing out on a significant amount of speed?

(But yes I agree that four looks better than two which is why I was asking about it, if I can get some particular speed/timing X to work on four dimms, will I notice any difference compared to getting it to work on two dimms?)
 

Bad_Company

Reputable
Aug 17, 2016
112
13
4,695
am4 lacks the necessary number of socket pins if im not mistaken. More pci lanes and quad channel support on thread ripper and epyc.

In theory you should be able to achieve the stock kit's frequencies and timing even with 4 dimms. Memory compatibility has come a long way. If you get a good dual kit ( highest available speed with lowest available cas ) and oc it a little bit you will definitely have the best performing choice of the above. That might translate to 200 hundred cinebench points or even a little more. But i cant quantify that on everyday use , gaming and rendering performance difference.

From my personal experience with my 2x16 3466 c16 trident z kit, running the kit @3400 c 16 and 3466 c14 with even custom set tighter secondary and tertiary timings, on everyday gaming sessions the difference is not visible. So bottom line, as long as you dont get a shitty kit like 2600 cl 16, real life performance difference is negligible. Hope i helped even slightly.
 
Last edited:

MoreMoneyThanSense

Reputable
Aug 4, 2019
136
2
4,585
4x8, but yeah, I like how four dimms look aesthetically. Kind of a silly reason I know, but I think four looks better than two. I don't know if that will severely limit me somewhere. I still don't fully understand what I am giving up by using four. I mean if I can hit 3600 CL 14 on four dimms, is something else strained more or not as fast/etc compared to 3600 CL 14 on two dimms?

I don't want to wreck infinity fabric stuff so I am assuming 3600 is the highest I should probably go and then if I am trying to overclock, shoot for tighter timings (if that's even worth doing or possible)? Or is that not how it works?
 

Bad_Company

Reputable
Aug 17, 2016
112
13
4,695
No one can say for sure that the quad kit will be stable @ 3600 c14. Theoretically the advertised 3600 c16 should be completely stable. You might want to check what overclocks people have achieved with this kit and your cpu. But i think you are stretching it and worrying for no reason for a 2-3% possible performance difference.

unfortunately trident z has no dummy modules :/ i haven't seen any on the market. If you have any info on trident z dummy please send a link, it will be apreciated. I would also like two have two more dimms, my pc needs more rgb !

edit : it was gigabyte that launched the aorus dummy kits
 
  • Like
Reactions: SgtScream