Monitor is much better than TV but it's also depends on TV. If TV is a 4k than TV better but if TV is 1080p then 24inch 1080p monitor is way better than 32inch 1080p monitor
What kind of games do you play? TV's can have slower response times, lower refresh rates, and higher input lag.
bf4 far cry 3 biger tv no many for 27 pc monitor i one 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M LED IPS, 16:10
16:10 is horrible for gaming as developers optimize the appearance of graphics for standard 16:9 aspect ratio. I would suggest getting something like this if you intend to game on it a lot. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236385
What kind of games do you play? TV's can have slower response times, lower refresh rates, and higher input lag.
bf4 far cry 3 biger tv no many for 27 pc monitor i one 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M LED IPS, 16:10
16:10 is horrible for gaming as developers optimize the appearance of graphics for standard 16:9 aspect ratio. I would suggest getting something like this if you intend to game on it a lot. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236385
27" GW2760hs BenQ VA LED Full HD 1920x1080 is 16:9
I recommend the Asus VG248QE, its a little more then the one linked above, but you can't go wrong with 144hz refresh, your games will be much smoother/clearer. IMO this is one of the best monitors for gamming out right now for FPS type games.
I agree the VG248QE is a good monitor (there is also a 27" version) but the colors are not as good as an IPS, so take that into consideration. I get the feeling that OP prefers picture quality to performance.
I recommend the Asus VG248QE, its a little more then the one linked above, but you can't go wrong with 144hz refresh, your games will be much smoother/clearer. IMO this is one of the best monitors for gamming out right now for FPS type games.