How do you know that hyper212 has maximum handle only 100 w,in coolermaster website it did not show the actual tdp that it can handle
You are correct. I couldn't find any maximum power specifations on the Cooler Master web site. It's suspicious they don't mention this important fact don't you think?
That's why resorted to checking review sites to see if they provided any clues. After reading several reviews, I still couldn't find any max. power numbers.
Instead, I inferred a
nominal rating of 100W from the review I mentioned earlier:
https://hardwarecanucks.com/cooling-power/cooler-master-hyper-212-evo-review/
If you remember, it stated:
at 125W, the 212 Evo starts falling further behind
This I interpreted to mean the 212 was reaching its limits at 125W.
at 150W the Evo gets overwhelmed since it can’t move heat away from the CPU fast enough, even when its fan is spinning at its maximum level. But look this was pretty much expected since this version of the 212 was never ever designed for this type of heat load.
This confirmed the 212 was incapable of cooling 150W.
I then provided a graph showing the 14700F can output 219W (possibly more).
If the 212 starts to struggle at 125W and is overwhelmed at 150W, what do you think will happen if it's asked to cool a CPU capable of dissipating 219W CPU?
The answer is that under load with a 212, the CPU cores will hit the 100 °C "throttle" point and stay there until the load is reduced.
Over-temperature protection will reduce the CPU clock speed and system performance will be adversely affected.
If you don't believe us, fit the 212 to the 14700F, run a stress test and check CPU temperature + clock speed. You'll have to modify the fixing brackets or use a glue gun.
Good luck if you persist with inadequate cooling.
they did not say it support lga 1700 just the socket.
Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by "just the socket".
The web site for the 212 does not mention support for motherboards fitted with an
LGA1700 socket. In other words, it won't fit.
The 212 list includes virtually all the other common and obsolete CPU sockets I can think of (apart from limited support for AM5).
As I said earlier, it seem likely the 1700 is not supported by the ancient 212 design, because this socket has a far more pronounced rectangular outline.