Hi,
So,im looking for an affordable usb flash drive on the internet and ive ended up with two options.One, is the Kingston DT50 64gb wich is about 10€ and it supports USB 2.0/3.0/3.1 Gen 1.And the second one is the Sandisk Ultra flair 64gb wich I found at a great deal from 22€ to 12€ but it only supports 3.0 and its a bit problematic,since reviews have shown that it gets extremely hot and might consult in a problem in the future.I want to use my flash drive on a usb 2.0 port,so I was wondering if I would benefit more on the kingston dt50 since it natively supports 2.0 speeds,while the sandisk one doesnt.The sanddisk one does actually achieve much higher speeds than the dt50 when plugged in a native 3.0 port rather than the dt50 when plugged in a 3.1 port.So which one should I buy?Will I benefit more from the DT50 since it supports 2.0 speeds?
So,im looking for an affordable usb flash drive on the internet and ive ended up with two options.One, is the Kingston DT50 64gb wich is about 10€ and it supports USB 2.0/3.0/3.1 Gen 1.And the second one is the Sandisk Ultra flair 64gb wich I found at a great deal from 22€ to 12€ but it only supports 3.0 and its a bit problematic,since reviews have shown that it gets extremely hot and might consult in a problem in the future.I want to use my flash drive on a usb 2.0 port,so I was wondering if I would benefit more on the kingston dt50 since it natively supports 2.0 speeds,while the sandisk one doesnt.The sanddisk one does actually achieve much higher speeds than the dt50 when plugged in a native 3.0 port rather than the dt50 when plugged in a 3.1 port.So which one should I buy?Will I benefit more from the DT50 since it supports 2.0 speeds?