Hi, long story short I had a disk read error on my HDD (Samsung 1TB). I'm running it externally off a different laptop (Windows 7). I tried Recova since I have used it successfully in the past; I had to run a quick format on my drive because it was displaying as raw However, Recova is not working. As in, it never gets past stage 1, hangs at 0% and didn't move for over 12 hours. (Regular scans fail, this is a deep scan I'm attempting. I know a 1TB HDD is going to take a while, but I'd assume there would be some sort of progress after 12 hours... and when I canceled it, no, no partial data was recorded as found by the program.)
So, I decided to try using Photorec instead. Problem is that when I try to run Photorec, it sticks at "disk identification, please wait". Same thing on TestDisk, it just doesn't get past attempting initial identification. The thing is that I ran TestDisk yesterday and it was working just fine. So I need help narrowing down whether this is a problem with my failed HDD or a problem with the system I'm using to run the programs. Yes, I installed a new version of TestDisk/Photorec, and also reinstalled an updated Recova before using it.
Yesterday TestDisk displayed the partitions for the bad HDD, so I'm assuming the data is recoverable if I can get a program working. But that's just as hopeful assumption.
Any insight, let me know. Thanks.
So, I decided to try using Photorec instead. Problem is that when I try to run Photorec, it sticks at "disk identification, please wait". Same thing on TestDisk, it just doesn't get past attempting initial identification. The thing is that I ran TestDisk yesterday and it was working just fine. So I need help narrowing down whether this is a problem with my failed HDD or a problem with the system I'm using to run the programs. Yes, I installed a new version of TestDisk/Photorec, and also reinstalled an updated Recova before using it.
Yesterday TestDisk displayed the partitions for the bad HDD, so I'm assuming the data is recoverable if I can get a program working. But that's just as hopeful assumption.
Any insight, let me know. Thanks.