Question Help replacing CPU for better reencode/system speeds (using i5 11400 now)

Perene

Distinguished
Oct 12, 2014
148
3
18,695
This is my current machine:

CPU Intel i5 11400, 32 GB DDR-4 (two 16 GB, 2666 MHz, Corsair Vengeance CMK32GX4M2A2666C16), motherboard MSI Z590-A Pro, Windows 11 64 bit. RTX 3060 (model DUAL-RTX3060-O12G-V2) for video card.

COOLER: Noctua NH-U12S chromax.black; Main SSD: WD_BLACK SN850X, 2 TB NVME.

CASE: LIAN LI, Lancool 216

I am not using the VGA for reencodes, they are H.265 only. Even so, the CPU leaves Windows slow more than I like, so I asked in chatGPT-like sites what should I do, and it was suggested to replace the CPU. If this also leads to replacing the motherboard, I don't know. I only asked for INTEL, so no AMD.

But the suggestions were not the same, and I forgot to ask one thing they may not know the answer: how much energy these would consume.

You see, this i5 CPU's TDP is 65W, so this indicates (as far as I know) it saves more on this.

Here's what I need to find out:

1) What CPU in terms of cost/benefit would represent a substantial upgrade over this one, in terms of reencodes (especially from these 4K contents, or video editing)?

2) Would this CPU need me to replace the motherboard?

3) Can I expect a lot more energy consumption, or slightly more than now?
 
Have you thought about GPU encoding for H.265?

3) Can I expect a lot more energy consumption, or slightly more than now?
If you're going with 12th, 13th or 14th, then yes. If you're going with the Gen after that the power draw was reduced a little and so did it's performance numbers. If you're lucky, you might not encounter any issues with the 13th/14th Gen processors. The 12th Gen is safe to invest on but that would mean you get a new motherboard, which happens to be a gateway into the 13th/14th Gen processors since the socket if the same.

You could logically put in an i7 without changing the motherboard but we're up that ladder in terms of power draw, again.
 
This is my current machine:

CPU Intel i5 11400, 32 GB DDR-4 (two 16 GB, 2666 MHz, Corsair Vengeance CMK32GX4M2A2666C16), motherboard MSI Z590-A Pro, Windows 11 64 bit. RTX 3060 (model DUAL-RTX3060-O12G-V2) for video card.

COOLER: Noctua NH-U12S chromax.black; Main SSD: WD_BLACK SN850X, 2 TB NVME.

CASE: LIAN LI, Lancool 216

I am not using the VGA for reencodes, they are H.265 only. Even so, the CPU leaves Windows slow more than I like, so I asked in chatGPT-like sites what should I do, and it was suggested to replace the CPU. If this also leads to replacing the motherboard, I don't know. I only asked for INTEL, so no AMD.

But the suggestions were not the same, and I forgot to ask one thing they may not know the answer: how much energy these would consume.

You see, this i5 CPU's TDP is 65W, so this indicates (as far as I know) it saves more on this.

Here's what I need to find out:

1) What CPU in terms of cost/benefit would represent a substantial upgrade over this one, in terms of reencodes (especially from these 4K contents, or video editing)?

2) Would this CPU need me to replace the motherboard?

3) Can I expect a lot more energy consumption, or slightly more than now?
What's busy when your doing this reencode and trying to do other stuff?
 
I am not using the VGA for reencodes, they are H.265 only. Even so, the CPU leaves Windows slow more than I like
If this is your only issue then set priority for the encoding to idle, if that's not enough you can use affinity to force the encoding to use only 5 out of the 6 cores so the other can run whatever else you want.
Affinity mask calculator, at the very bottom they give you the console command that you can use in a batch file, if you add /low after the hexcode it will also start it with the lowest priority.

Both of these can also be set by task manager in real time, just go to the details tab and right click on the encoding task.
No matter what CPU with how many cores you will get, CPU encoding of 265 will always use all of them (at lest when talking about desktop cpus) .