CV_Taihou :
Barty1884 :
Why must every thread turn into an AMD vs Intel thing?
The OP asked about an AMD build....so I'm going to try and get back on topic.
OP, you've mentioned prices are different in your country but gave a budget in USD. It's probably better to let us know where you will be buying components from (ie which country...which website etc). Prices can vary dramatically in different locales & the exchange rate doesn't really matter. What does is the currency you plan to buy in.
Which games are you looking to play? You're right about more cores being helpful for editing etc, and the FX-8350 is probably a good suggestion for it's pricepoint (in USD at least)
That was my thought as well. I agree the 8350 would be better for rendering and recording thanks to the cores, but if it's just gaming performance you're looking at then it's literally all in Intel's court. I guess it depends on how much 'work' you're doing as opposed to gaming. If the gaming outweighs the 'work' by any amount really I'd probably get an Intel processor, especially considering that you can always upgrade to an i7 later on down the road should you choose, whereas the AMD upgrade path is pretty much nonexistent
Intels advantage in gaming is more theoretical than actual .
Monitors refresh at 60 Hz . This is the exact same thing as 60 fps . If two computer make 60 and 160 fps respectively then all that ever appears on screen to the user is 60 fps . In one case the monitor will be randomly dropping 100 fps and never displaying them .
This means that any time you have a minimum fps of 60 you are getting everything you can on screen .
Mostly what you get by pushing higher fps is screen tearing .
And of course every benchmark gaming benchmark I have seen is in single player mode without the load of all the other players . Having extra cores really starts to pay off when the game engine can use them .
Generally you find there is no gaming advantage to either intel nor AMD . They just have different strengths .