High config. PC 3d animation and Editing purpose

[thokchomrs12]

Hi, I am planning to build a high confg. PC for 3d model, texture, rigg, animation and VFX After effect, premier as high editing purpose even 4k resolution within my budget (80k to 85k INR) $1200 to 1250. So in futere I can run and use it for my multimedia studio.

my config is: (any changes for better.. just let me know because once I buy this will be for 5 years)

cpu fx 8350 Rs 14000
mobos Gigabyte ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Killer Rs 14000
smp coasiar vs750 Rs 5000
dvd Lg Rs 1000
cabinet cooler master Rs 2000
gpu GTX 780 3gb Rs 33000
cooler cooler master Rs 3000
ram Gskill 8gb 1600 Rs 5000
hard disk 1TB WD Rs 4000
ssd samsung evo 850 Rs 5000
monitor Dell 22" 1080p Rs9000


Always I have a confusion on mobos and GPU that how fast and quality will give on VFX, 3d modelling, texture, rig animation and full editing purpose as 4k.

 

[sirstinky]

Well, I don't know how the currency exchange goes, but in USD, that number is barely enough to get you by for what you want to do. The FX-8350 is such old technology...it's 3 years old and even though it still has a niche, the new Intel processors are much better. I recommend the Intel i7-4770 at around $320 USD. Also, for the motherboard, you need one that's Intel compatible. I recommend the ASRock Z97 Extreme 4. A good board with a ton of features for a great price, around $128 USD. Everything else is good. I would think about 16 GB RAM though. The extra will help with 3D modeling/animation. A 16 GB (8GB x2) runs about $100-115 USD. Also, the graphics card needs an update. The 780 is good, but the new GTX 970 is better (and newer tech) for around $320 USD. Hope that helps!

 

[thokchomrs12]

Well, I don't know how the currency exchange goes, but in USD, that number is barely enough to get you by for what you want to do. The FX-8350 is such old technology...it's 3 years old and even though it still has a niche, the new Intel processors are much better. I recommend the Intel i7-4770 at around $320 USD. Also, for the motherboard, you need one that's Intel compatible. I recommend the ASRock Z97 Extreme 4. A good board with a ton of features for a great price, around $128 USD. Everything else is good. I would think about 16 GB RAM though. The extra will help with 3D modeling/animation. A 16 GB (8GB x2) runs about $100-115 USD. Also, the graphics card needs an update. The 780 is good, but the new GTX 970 is better (and newer tech) for around $320 USD. Hope that helps!

thank for your suggs....
i7-4770 is having 4 core ... how sure it will run like 8 core for multitasking????
and
GPU 780 vs 970 is
4096 MB vs 3072 MB (what it does in multimedia field??)
Memory Speed 1753 MHz vs 1750 MHz (what it does in multimedia field??)
Memory Bus 256 Bit vs 384 Bit (what it does in multimedia field??)
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5 (what it does in multimedia field??)
Memory Bandwidth 224.4GB/sec vs 336GB/sec (what it does in multimedia field??)
L2 Cache 1792 KB green tick vs 1536 KB (what it does in multimedia field??)

Comparison
GPU Display

Shader Processing Units 1664 vs 2880 (what it does in multimedia field??)
Actual Shader Performance 2646 vs 3125 (what it does in multimedia field??)
Technology 28nm vs 28nm (what it does in multimedia field??)
Texture Mapping Units 104 vs 240 (what it does in multimedia field??)
Texture Rate 109.2 GTexel/s vs 244.8 GTexel/s (what it does in multimedia field??)
Render Output Units 56 vs 48 (what it does in multimedia field??)
Pixel Rate 58.8 GPixel/s vs 49 GPixel/s (what it does in multimedia field??)

Here I have seen 970 is good in over all and 780 is good in some other parts, but I don't know the actuall purpose of given each compared specification.. so if you explain each specification does work for a particular job then it will be helpfull to understand me.

 

[sirstinky]

Not a problem!

For the Intel i7, expect to get better performance all around. The FX8350 is an 8-core CPU, but the cores don't work together as good as Intel's. You get more out of 4 cores than 8 with the FX. For multimedia, the i7 will match or beat the FX. It also has hyper threading, which helps the 4 cores behave like 8 because each core can address 2 threads. The i7 also uses less power and generates less heat 84 watts vs. 125 for AMD.

For the 780 vs. 970, the 970 is the replacement for 780. It has new GPU technology, faster cores GPU and memory, and has more memory capacity. While the 780 is still a great card, the 970 is still better overall thanks to more efficient processing and more memory capacity. You can run higher resolutions across more displays with the 970. It's a very close race between them, and sometimes the difference will be negligible, but you get more with the 970, plus it's the newest GPU technology while the 780 is still roughly based on the old 6-series (GTX 670-680) GPU.

4 GB is better than 3. The more the better because the extra RAM helps the GPU work faster and process data faster, turning all that data from your CPU into a visible image. It's especially helpful in high resolutions like full 1440p or running multiple displays.

Memory speed is how fast the memory runs, like your CPU, the memory is basically the gateway from the PCIe buss to the GPU. The faster the memory clock, the faster the data is processed. This gives you better performance overall.

Memory bus is basically like an aperture in a camera. The bigger the number, the more data can be processed across the PCIe slot. Although the bus is bigger on the 780 (384 bit vs 256), the 970 is able to get more data across the bus simply because the RAM runs faster in both speed and clocks. This means better performance from the 970.

For bandwidth, think of the memory speed in MHz. The faster the memory can run, the more data can be processed across the bus, which means more electrons being turned into photons. The bigger the bandwidth on the bus (384 vs 256), the more the bandwidth and the more bits can cross it.

Cache for GPU's is kind of arbitrary and not readily discussed. It's more important on CPU's in terms of overall performance.

The 28nm is the size of the transistors in the GPU. The smaller the number, generally the more efficient the processor runs-it gets more done with the resources it has available (shader cores, texture units, pixel rate). The 970's GPU has the same size transistors as the 780, but the Maxwell GPU in the 970 is more efficient, runs raster (over 1100 GHz in EVGA's cards vs. about 980 for the 780). The faster the better.

Shader units, also called "cuda cores" are responsible for turning data into a picture. The more shaders generally the better performance, but that is not always the case. Other things go into actual data resolution than shaders. Although the 780 has more, it still doesn't beat the 970 simply because the 970 has more available memory to utilize. It's a very close race, but the 970 is generally faster. Same for texture units and texture mapping/rate and render units. Pixel rate is the number of pixels can be resolved at one time. The more the better. That's 58 billion pixels per second that are rendered.

For multimedia, it's going to be close between these cards, but for overall performance and longevity and price, I'd go for the 970.

 

[thokchomrs12]

thanks a lot yar.... I have done with 4770k with 970 gpu