Wow, lots of information here. Let's see...
Lithotech: I think I might have preferred the top PSU placement as well, but then again, I'm not sure that the air from the very hot parts on the mobo would be exhausted well enough. As is, it'll be OK. Also, the Galaxy has 60cm ATX12V and 2x8-pin 12V connectors, while the TJ10 is only 52cm tall! I checked that. So I think cabling might work well, actually, in this particular case. I was thinking about running the main power cables behind the motherboard tray. The power connectors for that Tyan are all located in great places and I can do exactly the same that has been done in this picture for the ATX Power connector:
Great, huh? But I need those 60cm that the Enermax Galaxy has to offer. The only thing I still don't know is something that could solve your other complaint about heat: should I really mount the galaxy so that cool air gets sucked from under the case, through the bottom grill?... I'm guessing yes, and in that case, hot air from the PSU would get exhausted directly outside the case by the 80mm fan. Remember, the galaxy actually has 2 fans!
Also, on the issue of cooling these xeons, the thermalright coolers are obviously much better than the chunks of bladed copper that Intel sells with those xeons. The stock coolers don't even have heatpipes, for crying out lout! The heatsinks will be enough. If I have problems with heat, it'll only be because of insufficient air flow.
Amiga500: We've done extensive tests that show C2D to be a much greater performer than any of the 65nm K8-derivatives, but we have not had the opportunity to test barcelona, nor is it readily available in any of the local stores. I'm very skeptical about it in its current iteration, so I'm very reluctant to advise getting a barcelona over a well-established and mature 45nm, 1.6Ghz dual-FSB workstation like this. Also, we're not interested in graphical work: this will be a number cruncher.
On the issue of OSs:We do not use commercial scientific code, we write our own code. You're probably using CentOS (more likely) or Fedora (less likely), right? I'm considering CentOS for this workstation, but that decision is still a long time away.
Thanks for your input, everyone.
Lithotech: I think I might have preferred the top PSU placement as well, but then again, I'm not sure that the air from the very hot parts on the mobo would be exhausted well enough. As is, it'll be OK. Also, the Galaxy has 60cm ATX12V and 2x8-pin 12V connectors, while the TJ10 is only 52cm tall! I checked that. So I think cabling might work well, actually, in this particular case. I was thinking about running the main power cables behind the motherboard tray. The power connectors for that Tyan are all located in great places and I can do exactly the same that has been done in this picture for the ATX Power connector:

Great, huh? But I need those 60cm that the Enermax Galaxy has to offer. The only thing I still don't know is something that could solve your other complaint about heat: should I really mount the galaxy so that cool air gets sucked from under the case, through the bottom grill?... I'm guessing yes, and in that case, hot air from the PSU would get exhausted directly outside the case by the 80mm fan. Remember, the galaxy actually has 2 fans!
Also, on the issue of cooling these xeons, the thermalright coolers are obviously much better than the chunks of bladed copper that Intel sells with those xeons. The stock coolers don't even have heatpipes, for crying out lout! The heatsinks will be enough. If I have problems with heat, it'll only be because of insufficient air flow.
Amiga500: We've done extensive tests that show C2D to be a much greater performer than any of the 65nm K8-derivatives, but we have not had the opportunity to test barcelona, nor is it readily available in any of the local stores. I'm very skeptical about it in its current iteration, so I'm very reluctant to advise getting a barcelona over a well-established and mature 45nm, 1.6Ghz dual-FSB workstation like this. Also, we're not interested in graphical work: this will be a number cruncher.
On the issue of OSs:We do not use commercial scientific code, we write our own code. You're probably using CentOS (more likely) or Fedora (less likely), right? I'm considering CentOS for this workstation, but that decision is still a long time away.
Thanks for your input, everyone.