Question How much more is the 12400f worth than the 5600

Holmsey7

Prominent
Aug 20, 2022
72
7
535
I can get a good b550 and 5600 for around 300, where as I can get a 12400f and good b660 and a cooler for around 360, is the 60 premium worth it for the difference in performance, could just OC and get close to the 12400f with the 5600 anyway
 
  • Like
Reactions: jnjnilson6
I can get a good b550 and 5600 for around 300, where as I can get a 12400f and good b660 and a cooler for around 360, is the 60 premium worth it for the difference in performance, could just OC and get close to the 12400f with the 5600 anyway
AMD 5600 -> 1175 points
Core i5-12400F -> 1245 points

The Core i5-12400F is 6% faster than the 5600, so I think the latter is a much more agreeable option for the price proffered. :)
 
So you think 5600 deal is best
Well, I do think so. In the end, however, it's your choice and your money so I would say to get the one which makes you the happiest. Apart from that they are pretty similar in performance so I don't think the extra money on the 12400F is worth it, and the i5-12400F is not a very good overclocker. But then-again if you have a strong penchant over one or the other, you should always do what you consider best. The overall performance won't be much different either way, only the price.
 
Well, I do think so. In the end, however, it's your choice and your money so I would say to get the one which makes you the happiest. Apart from that they are pretty similar in performance so I don't think the extra money on the 12400F is worth it, and the i5-12400F is not a very good overclocker. But then-again if you have a strong penchant over one or the other, you should always do what you consider best. The overall performance won't be much different either way, only the price.
If i OC the 5600 would the performance basically be equal?
 
You should definitely be able to overtake it if the motherboard allows for overclocking, although keeping in mind how very powerful the 5600 proves for the most pressuring tasks of today it would be at least 2 years time until you'd actually feel any major impact from overclocking.
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/asu...00-ddr4-pcie-50-sata3-3x-m2-25gbe-ax-wifi-atx
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/gig...3-pcie-40-3x-m2-25gbe-usb-32-gen2-hdmi-dp-atx
Not sure which board the white one fits m white aesthetics and seems to be higher quality but the other is 40 cheaper?
 
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/asu...00-ddr4-pcie-50-sata3-3x-m2-25gbe-ax-wifi-atx
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/gig...3-pcie-40-3x-m2-25gbe-usb-32-gen2-hdmi-dp-atx
Not sure which board the white one fits m white aesthetics and seems to be higher quality but the other is 40 cheaper?
The ASUS one seems a little better. It supports PCIe 5.0, where the Gigabyte one, as far as I've seen, supports only 4.0 and proves a little inferior in terms of capabilities. Of course, if you can, you may dangle on the cheaper mobo and purchase a faster processor in addition to the remainder of the money, the 40 pounds (if you can find a better processor with the addition of the aforesaid money). So you don't want AMD. Well, that's cool, I mean, personally, I am an Intel fan too. Especially since I've had a dreary experience with ancient Semprons 3300+ and later - an AMD Athlon II M300. I mean, I am sure the latest AMD CPUs aren't at all like that and work wonderfully and perfectly like their Intel counterparts. Call it snobbism or being true to the brand or whatever, but I'm having my eye more often on Intel processors than AMD ones, at least for now.
 
The ASUS one seems a little better. It supports PCIe 5.0, where the Gigabyte one, as far as I've seen, supports only 4.0 and proves a little inferior in terms of capabilities. Of course, if you can, you may dangle on the cheaper mobo and purchase a faster processor in addition to the remainder of the money, the 40 pounds (if you can find a better processor with the addition of the aforesaid money). So you don't want AMD. Well, that's cool, I mean, personally, I am an Intel fan too. Especially since I've had a dreary experience with ancient Semprons 3300+ and later - an AMD Athlon II M300. I mean, I am sure the latest AMD CPUs aren't at all like that and work wonderfully and perfectly like their Intel counterparts. Call it snobbism or being true to the brand or whatever, but I'm having my eye more often on Intel processors than AMD ones, at least for now.
I honestly could not care which, whichever gives me best performance for the cheapest price will do me, you also get a free mw2 code with the 12400f which i may just sell and get the 50 pound back
 
I honestly could not care which, whichever gives me best performance for the cheapest price will do me, you also get a free mw2 code with the 12400f which i may just sell and get the 50 pound back
Have you checked out the AMD Ryzen 5500? It's really very fast and if you could find it for a price a good margin below that of the 5600 it may prove the best option in terms of price / performance. A friend of mine got one really cheap (he upgraded from an i7-3770) and he was very happy with it. It depends, however, if you can find one cheaper than the 5600 and how much cheaper at that, so we may reason out if the performance differences are worth the lower price.
 
I honestly could not care which, whichever gives me best performance for the cheapest price will do me, you also get a free mw2 code with the 12400f which i may just sell and get the 50 pound back
Ryzen 5500 -> 1117 points
Ryzen 5600 -> 1175 points

The difference is only 5% which is no difference at all. If you could save some bucks by getting the 5500 over the 5600, I think it'd be a good idea.
 
Last edited:
As an amd user myself, Ryzen was great and you would probably be happy with a 5600. However that said, keep in mind socket am4 is basically end of life. So you likely won’t be able to upgrade again on the cpu front. If you go Intel, someone correct me if I’m mistaken but I think if you get a 12th gen Intel setup that the op may be able later up to upgrade to a 13th generation cpu. To me that would be a consideration as that’s been one of the advantages amd typically holds over Intel, but in this case the opposite seems to be true. So consider if say in 2 years if you will want to upgrade the cpu to a a 13th generation i7 for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jnjnilson6
As an amd user myself, Ryzen was great and you would probably be happy with a 5600. However that said, keep in mind socket am4 is basically end of life. So you likely won’t be able to upgrade again on the cpu front. If you go Intel, someone correct me if I’m mistaken but I think if you get a 12th gen Intel setup that the op may be able later up to upgrade to a 13th generation cpu. To me that would be a consideration as that’s been one of the advantages amd typically holds over Intel, but in this case the opposite seems to be true. So consider if say in 2 years if you will want to upgrade the cpu to a a 13th generation i7 for example.
That's a great piece of advice! I thought of that too; but there's also the fact that in about 4 years the op may get a secondhand Ryzen 5950X for a manageable price and get a lot more performance out of it in comparison to the 5600. So, of course, there's this side to the question too. But as you've said, it's very good that LGA1700 is still quite alive and would support the next generation. :)
 
Worth is something only YOU can determine.
If your main workload is batch apps that can make use of all threads, then the 5600 is better.
If your use is for gaming, then the better single thread performance of the 12400f is better,
Here are the passmark numbers:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+5+5600&id=4811

Do not look to overclocking as a way to get something for nothing.
Chips are binned. For gaming, the turbo mechanism is more effective.

Intel 13th gen launch is imminent. So is the amd launch.
Expect to see a 15% boost in price/performance.
It might be prudent to wait.

Lastly, when I am faced with a price vs. performance issue, if I buy the cheaper one, I am forever second guessing myself.
Better to pay a bit more up front for something good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roland Of Gilead
Zen 3 is a fine product. I mean come on I just put a 5900x into my b350 board and it seems quite happy. The 5950x is a good thought but you still won’t be able to make up a gap in single thread between zen 3 and Intel 13th gen. Perhaps if you have a 5800x3d then in some circumstances.

If this were a situation where the op had an existing socket am4 pc even with a decent b350 or x370 board, go ryzen definitely. But this close to a new socket I can’t recommend am4 unless you are getting a deal. Not that zen 3 is a bad product it was a great product. But simply will soon be eclipsed by newer tech.

Can’t speak to this but I thought some reviewers and YouTube people had mentioned that it sounded like socket am4 still might have a future a couple of more years? I’m not sure. But if so maybe they’d relegate am4 to being a platform for apus for example like if they wanted to have a 6700g apu for example as a cut down version of the 7700x. But why would you maintain 2 sockets?
 

TRENDING THREADS