Didn't notice you bothered to reply until I checked threads, so a little late in my reply, but I feel it is needed for the OP and future readers to clear up the confusion created by your taking it 'personally' and trying to attack my motives because you did not actually understand what was being said and why.
Why would I want to put that aside?
It matters to the question especially in order to UNDERSTAND the limitations, not just guess at them like you did without even bothering to theorize and support your statements. You simply re-posted other people's unrelated limited experiences, while attacking other people's advice correct advice because it didn't jive with what you'd misread.
this is what it boils down to:
Passive DP>DVI adapters will not work under ANY resolution while running an Eyefinity setup in which you're using 3 monitors.
Then explain this from your chosen source site using a similar path, but different way of achieving the same thing;
http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=17468
Working example of DVI+DVI+(Passive DP->VGA adapter) = Eyefinity.
And the official comment by Eyefinity Godfather Carrell Killebrew from ATi (not some random '2 ATi guys') on the subject;
http://www.hardocp.com/news/2009/11/30/eyefinity_using_active_adapter
" The capability was built-in to SunSp*t but as things got closer and closer to launch we had to focus on what we knew we could deliver (within that time-span). Where things ended up w.r.t VGA was that there were so many possible resolutions, refresh rates, older displays, etc. that we punted and declined to specify scenarios that could use VGA. There are modes in SunSp*t that are useful, but the number of possibilities vastly exceeds our ability to verify they all work.
There are "opportunities" to experiment and discover what does and doesn't work. "
Like I said before "ATi agrees with me on this one". [:thegreatgrapeape]
Do you suppose it might be because it's not using the TMDS timing to drive the VGA, just as described to you?
So don't criticize my motives and the damage of my recommendation as a wasting their money, while you're advocating spending the extra ~$80 after you criticizing my recommendation he need only spend ~$20 instead.
So what it REALLY boils down to is that you DON'T NEED the active adapter, but you really need to keep track of your connections, as said before by someone I believe. 😗
Next time don't take it so 'personally' and maybe you'll be able to see/understand what other people are saying, instead of being as you put it "quite offensive" and questioning their intentions as to "take that to a new extreme by stating this misunderstanding of yours as fact".
- OH yeah, and PS, also in your words:
You could perhaps make a more concerted effort to just admit when you're mistaken.