I need a Size restricted GPU

[Luddite1]

175 MM or less in length Double wide.
That's 6.88 inches, max length.
I need to push a 3440 by 1440 monitor and a 2nd 1920 by 1080.
The cards needs a HDMI and a Display Port out.
I am aware of some cards that meet these requirements, r9 Nano way out of my price range. I know some versions of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti meet the requirements and is in my price range. I'm not gaming! Is there a card I've missed perhaps above the GTX 750 ti? Thanks

 

[Gam3r01]

http://pcpartpicker.com/parts/compare/asus-video-card-gtx970dcmoc4gd5,msi-video-card-gtx9502gd5oc/
?

 

[basroil]

You just said you don't need gaming, which means you don't need anything. Just use integrated graphics, and make sure your motherboard has HDMI and DP

 

[Pyre]

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125772

Or

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Gigabyte-Nvidia-Version-PCI-E-Graphics/dp/B00SJ8FZZ0?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0

Also if its not for gaming maybe you should go with what basroil said unless you will game once in a while.

 

[Luddite1]

I am currently using the on board graphics of a i7 6700 chip with a 1920/1080 asus monitor which works fine for internet browsing, but financial graphs don't scroll well at all. Since I'm considering adding a Samsung S34E790C monitor to the work load a basic GPU is needed.
Thanks for pointing out some excellent choices. The GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 960 2GB Mini ITX OC EDITION is more than enough. Amazon.ca has the dimensions wrong and such issues across the net certainly extend the hours one can spend searching for tech at the best price, I'm glad I asked, and thanks again for your time and suggestions!

The solution was to go with the Intel CPU chip i7 6700 graphics. No additional card is needed. The solution selected above should be disregarded, I have no idea how to edit/remove it.
basroil who's post follows is correct. The original charting software was slow, a resource pig and I changed it.

 

[basroil]

I am currently using the on board graphics of a i7 6700 chip with a 1920/1080 asus monitor which works fine for internet browsing, but financial graphs don't scroll well at all.

GPU won't help, most graphing software is 100% CPU limited, even those with GPU acceleration. When you see that you have problems even after the GPU install, come back and and correct your mistaken answer

 

[Luddite1]

I am currently using the on board graphics of a i7 6700 chip with a 1920/1080 asus monitor which works fine for internet browsing, but financial graphs don't scroll well at all.

GPU won't help, most graphing software is 100% CPU limited, even those with GPU acceleration. When you see that you have problems even after the GPU install, come back and and correct your mistaken answer

 

[Luddite1]

Hello basroil you are correct, runs fine without a graphics card as I've just found out. Sorry that took so long. Life interrupted the original plans. I tossed out the charting program, the new one flies. Thanks to all. Cheers.

 

[basroil]

Hello basroil you are correct, runs fine without a graphics card as I've just found out. Sorry that took so long. Life interrupted the original plans. I tossed out the charting program, the new one flies. Thanks to all. Cheers.

Go ahead and correct the selected solution then so others don't get confused

 

[Luddite1]

The April 19th post above, has been edited today to reflect the fact no graphics card was needed.
I don't see a way to edit/remove the originally selected solution.
Thanks to all, cheers.

 

[basroil]

The April 19th post above, has been edited today to reflect the fact no graphics card was needed.
I don't see a way to edit/remove the originally selected solution.
Thanks to all, cheers.

Access from a desktop and you'll see a "Select post" or "unselect post" button right inside the post. Why inside the post rather than with all the other buttons? Not sure

 

[basroil]

>>Hello, Yes. I've searched the page, the post choice I'd like to change and searched for help on changing my choice, no luck at all. Perhaps too much time has passed. This is definitely something the site owners/operators could make some improvements too.

As per the original poster's request I have unselected the answer