So yeah what the title says really. Primarily a gaming PC which I want to use to play the newest AAA games like Watch Dogs Legion and Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p 144Hz with high/ultra settings and ray tracing if possible. Both builds are quoted around the same price with the builder I'm buying from (yes I know I could save money by building myself). Which is better for gaming and which do you think would be more future proof? The 10400f 3070 combo seems fairly popular while the 10600k 3060 Ti combo seems more untested. The 10600k obviously has the advantage of being overclockable but I can't tell whether it's enough of an improvement to the 10400f to offset the worse GPU. Any opinions would be welcome!
p.s. I know the R5 5600x is a thing but it's more expensive and horribly stocked right now plus doesn't seem to be a huge difference with the 3060 Ti so I'm happy with the 10600k in that build. And the AMD equivalent for the 10400f at the same price would be the 3500x (or 3600 if I stretched the budget) but both have worse benchmarks for gaming so I'm happy going with Intel despite AMD CPUs being better all-rounders.
p.s. I know the R5 5600x is a thing but it's more expensive and horribly stocked right now plus doesn't seem to be a huge difference with the 3060 Ti so I'm happy with the 10600k in that build. And the AMD equivalent for the 10400f at the same price would be the 3500x (or 3600 if I stretched the budget) but both have worse benchmarks for gaming so I'm happy going with Intel despite AMD CPUs being better all-rounders.