10105f one. you could upgrade it into i5 10400f which is the same specs as i7 8700, and up to i9 11900/10900 variants. all of the core i series have multi thread on 10th and 11th gen.
Someone -?-?-?-?
Both are comparable.
But the i3-10105 has a slightly higher single thread passmark performance, 2713 vs. 2585 for the 8600.
Your games depend on cpu single thread performance.
And, you may want more than 8gb.
10105f one. you could upgrade it into i5 10400f which is the same specs as i7 8700, and up to i9 11900/10900 variants. all of the core i series have multi thread on 10th and 11th gen.
I want some more opinions, i wont upgarde this pc it should last 3-4 years after that i will buy i Another one.you have your answers.
i3-10105f pc is better.wich one should i pick I’m in big dilemma the i5 is quicker but the i3 is newer
Yes it looks like an old pc, but they make those pc’s like that,thats a company from Germany https://www.wortmann.de/de-at/search.aspx?q=*&category=AA_TERRA_PCi3-10105f pc is better.
i5-8600 pc looks like it's from year 2005.
Both probably have terrible airflow and questionable PSUs in them.
i3-10105f probably is better upgradeable. Slap in a better gpu (when gpu prices/availablility improves), upgrade PSU (to meet gpu power consumption) and that pc can easily last another 10 years.
Your answer was very helpful thank you for your time^^you could try and see intel i3 till i9 from gen 8 and 9 specs, then compare it to 10th gen and 11th gen specs. after that compare their prices. soon you'll know why 10105f is the best choice. no matter who made the pc, you must make a asumption why any intel below 10th gen is not worth he prices today (even a used i7 8700 is still not worth it compared to i5 10400f, atleast in my country)