i7 4790K Low Rendering Speeds?

FireLostAngel

Reputable
Dec 22, 2014
26
0
4,530
Recently I watched a video in where a guy renders a 3:15-3:30min clip at 60fps 1080p in Sony Vegas 13 in around 7:30 min but when I was rendering a 3:30min clip also in 60fps and 1080p it will take 20 minutes to complete not even in 30fps and lower bitratio could achieve the 7:30 min time of the video.
Even using my gpu for rendering and in the video is using only the cpu.


The video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_djDggPlKjU
System specs: http://prntscr.com/9oaxhx
Temps and usage while rendering : http://prntscr.com/9oaz19

I expected more from the cpu, only a week since i bought it, I don´t think those rendering times are normal What it could be and how could I fix it?
 
Solution
HDD to SSD, opening files is 25 to 30% faster on SSD, and sequential reads and writes are 50 to 100 Mb/s on HDD and 300 to 500 Mb/s for SSDs. That system is using SSds at the upper end of speed. Modern NVMM.2 or PCIe SSD drives can get 1500 to 2500 for those operations.

I would and do pus a SSD in all systems over about $650. If budget is an issue, it is the HDD which is left out at the start and added later. I also do not use SSDs smaller than 250Gb any more and prefer 500Gb. Larger drives are more cost effective and run a little faster.
In order to compare with another system we need to know what their specifications are. You have the right parts to do well and your CPU is at near full utilization. What sort of benchmarking did you do on your system to get a performance baseline?

Does your memory have and XMP profile you can use to increase its speed? You would need to go into BIOS to find out.

You are running at 1/3 of the speed of a 'similar' system and that suggests something major is different (stating the obvious, I know)
 


Yeah, my memory have XMP profile, but the memory and SSD or an HDD could really do that difference?
 
The main difference between your system and the video that you linked is the use of SSDs instead of a single hard disk (he's rendering the from an SSD to a different SSD while you're rendering from and to the same slow HDD). You have a different video card, but he says the GPU isn't used.

Why no SSDs with such a powerful system?
 
HDD to SSD, opening files is 25 to 30% faster on SSD, and sequential reads and writes are 50 to 100 Mb/s on HDD and 300 to 500 Mb/s for SSDs. That system is using SSds at the upper end of speed. Modern NVMM.2 or PCIe SSD drives can get 1500 to 2500 for those operations.

I would and do pus a SSD in all systems over about $650. If budget is an issue, it is the HDD which is left out at the start and added later. I also do not use SSDs smaller than 250Gb any more and prefer 500Gb. Larger drives are more cost effective and run a little faster.
 
Solution