[SOLVED] i7 7700k stock tempreature measurements, 100c vs 63c

PilatTao

Commendable
Jun 3, 2017
12
0
1,510
Hello my dear tomshardware community, after i search around this and some other forums about this problem and doesnt found answer i decided to start this topic:

My setup:
Maximus viii hero,
i7 7700k,
1080ti,
8x4 corsair VENGEANCE 3333mhz

After about 1 year of usage, i find xmp profile for my memory and set it. After this - i get few bsod's(watchdog timeout) and start researching this problem.
And, when i tried to find my CPU tempreatures i found this:
On AIDA64 HWIDmonitor and CoreTemp i found
50-60c on idle, 100c on prime95(26.6) stress
but, on SpeedFan: 40 on idle and 63 on stress.

Soo, what should i do and where's my problem? Hardware issues or software bugs? And what tempreture is accurate? Here's my screens after 15m of prime95. (bios updated to 3805 and reset to default)
5a9505aba5bc8233db6fd1dc3d104df3.png

0b10140d577a9dd0ce64d0c0e9591e9c.png

709c6ea73c077d5d020171872fa78f0a.png

8cc4d3c87feec54631839d96993ac066.png

e7248d42c806d4889bc2f03b5f0f88e6.png

and here my idle screen
f14b3a6dda9aa5c3105f6bef280e224c.png

cpu radiator after prime test is room tempreature by touch, there's problem with it connection with cpu and i should remount it? Or it's normal?
 
Solution
There are no 7th Generation i7 Desktop processors with a base clock of 3.9 GHz. Respectfully, when quoting specifications, for accuracy, future reference and the benefit of other Members and readers, please refer to Intel's Processor Specifications website: Product Specifications - https://ark.intel.com/#@Processors

Base clock for the i7 7700K is 4.2 GHz: Intel® Core™ i7-7700K Processor - https://ark.intel.com/products/97129/Intel-Core-i7-7700K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4-50-GHz-

Don't use that version of Prime.

Prime95 v26.6 is THE primarily accepted way to do the majority of baseline thermal compliance testing running the Small FFT option.

Prime95 Version 26.6 download


Further, you can find extensive information regarding the Intel CPU architectures and specifications at the following link which is a somewhat definitive guide on that subject. The information below is taken directly from conversations with Computronix who is also the author of the Intel temperature guide, found here:

The Intel temperature guide

For AMD systems, specifically Zen/Ryzen, this should offer similar albeit not nearly as detailed information on that architecture.

Ryzen overclocking guide


AMD FX and A series overclocking guide



This is probably about the most referred to overclocking guide around, and it's principles can be applied to a variety of generations and platforms.

The Ultimate Overclocking Guide



This pretty well sums things up and is equally relevant whether working with an Intel or an AMD system.

I can think of several reasons why x264 encoding or AVX / AVX2 / FMA3 apps won't work as a unilateral metric for thermal testing.

(1) A steady-state workload gives steady-state temperatures; encoding does not.

(2) Simplicity in methodology; most users would find encoding apps unfamiliar and cumbersome to accomplish a simple task.

(3) Most users such as gamers never run any apps which use AVX or FMA, so adaptive or manual voltage aside, it makes no sense to downgrade your overclock to accommodate those loads and temps unless you KNOW you will be making significant use of AVX/FMA/AVX2.

(4) Standardization; Prime95 has been around since 1996; many users are familiar with it. It is TRIED and TRUE.

For the minority of users who routinely run AVX/FMA apps, then P95 v28.5 or later can be useful for tweaking the BIOS for thermal and stability testing on THOSE types of systems only. For others, it is not recommended.


regardless of platform or architecture, Prime95 v26.6 works equally well across ALL platforms. Steady-state is the key. How can anyone extrapolate accurate core temperatures from workloads that fluctuate like a bad day on the stock market? They can't. That's why steady state is necessary for testing of thermal compliance and for baseline stability verification.

I'm aware of 5 utilities with steady-state workloads. In order of load level they are:

(1) Prime95 v26.6 - Small FFT's (Important. NOT Blend or Large FFT)
(2) HeavyLoad - Stress CPU
(3) FurMark - CPU Burner
(4) Intel Processor Diagnostic Tool - CPU Load
(5) AIDA64 - Tools - System Stability Test - Stress CPU

AIDA64's Stress CPU fails to load any overclocked / overvolted CPU to get anywhere TDP, and is therefore useless, except for giving naive users a sense of false security because their temps are so low.

HeavyLoad is the closest alternative. Temps and watts are within 3% of Small FFT's.

-Computronix



As for the memory configuration, this:

http://www.tomshardware.com/faq/id-3817589/resolving-memory-issues-setting-xmp-amp-docp-memory-profiles-work-progress.html
 
PilatTao,

I see you've been a Member for nearly a year and a half, but since this is your first post, on behalf of Tom's Moderator Team, welcome aboard!

In your screenshot, ignore SpeedFan's "CPU" temperature as there's no actual CPU thermal sensor; SpeedFan has instead mis-assigned another sensor, (probably VRM temperature) and has mis-named it "CPU". This is a common problem among many monitoring utilities. Hardware Info is the most accurate and reliable monitoring utility - https://www.hwinfo.com/download.php

The only temperatures you should be concerned with are "Core" temperatures. If you're not familiar with how to properly configure SpeedFan, it has a steep learning curve, so it's going to be confusing at first. For example, the alarming "flame" icons are simply thermal limits that haven't yet been configured.

SpeedFan isn't showing Core temperatures because you haven't configured it to do so. If you click on the "Configure" tab, you'll see all four "Core" temperatures. Check the boxes so Core temperatures will show on SpeedFan's initial window. Use "Help and How To" in SpeedFan's Folder, and use FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) on SpeedFan's website to learn how to configure this utility.

It's also likely that SpeedFan's Core temperatures will be mis-calibrated 15°C too low, which is a known problem. Go to Configure > Advanced > Chip > INTEL CORE > Temperature offset 1, 2, 3 and 4. Change them all from "0" to "15", and click on "remember it" for each, then click "OK". When properly configured, Core temperatures in SpeedFan should agree with your other utilities.

Although you haven't mentioned which AIO liquid cooler you're running, the reason your Core temperatures are reaching "Throttle" temperature at 100°C is that it's highly likely your pump has failed. 1 year is quite typical for AIO pump failure.

Even if monitoring utilities give you pump RPM, and you can "hear" the motor running and "feel" vibration doesn't prove the pump's "impeller" is rotating or coolant is actually flowing. Since the motor is magnetically coupled to the impeller, it's indirectly driven, so there's no shaft between the motor and the impeller.

This means the impeller can be "stalled" or stopped from rotating, yet the motor can continue to rotate without being stalled. A stalled motor can further damage the pump and wiring, as well as the motherboard's power delivery to the CPU / Pump header. A stalled impeller is typically caused by sediments that accumulate due to galvanic corrosion (dissimilar metals), such as an aluminum radiator used with a copper water block, which is common among AIO units.

As you noted, the radiator is cool, which indicates little to no flow. Another indication of a flow problem is if one tube is cool while the other is hot close to the pump. Normally, nothing should feel "hot"; there should be a minimal to moderate temperature difference between both tubes, even during sustained 100% workload such as Prime95 v26.6 Small FFT's.

Also, what is your ambient (room) temperature?

Once again, welcome aboard!

CT :sol:
 
Hi PilatTao,
Your CPU is throttling, It means that, because it reaches its max temperature allowed, the frequency drops to the base clock (3.9GHz).

The only issue directly related is your CPU cooler. Which cooler do you have?
Try to change the thermal paste and reseat it correctly.

Let us know.


Rodolphe.
 
After i reseatl cooler and reapply thermal grease i achived 40-45c on 1% load and 30-38c in BIOS.
But, i think 94c-100c-97c-93c(1core,2core,3core,4core) on prime95 fast test is still high, isnt it? And now it's throttle not to 3.9 but to 4.2(i think just turbo went off)
 
Your cooler is more than capable to handle your processor at stock speed.

1°/ How many case fans do you have?

2°/ What thermal paste do have?

3°/ How did you clean the old thermal paste?

4°/ How did you apply the new thermal paste? and How much?



Rodolphe.
 
There's something wrong somewhere.

4 case fan is more than enough. 2 intake 2 exhaust?
This thermal paste is goos enough, and is low viscosity so no problem to squeeze it between the IHS and the Cooler.

At what speed does you case fan turn?
Do your CPU fan turn?


Rodolphe.
 
Also i tried to play with aisuite3(dual intellegent processor 5) (installed it first time btw), and it oc my cpu to 4.6, my mem from 2.1 to 2.9, and i think limited cpu temp to 89c. Aftet that - furmark cpu burner get me throthled only to 4.4-4.5 (on 89c), prime95 still get it to 4.2-4.3(but on 89c).
Also, the thing i noted : hwmonitor still say my core temps 100c, but
1) Is this temperature falls from 100c to 40c in about 3-4s normal?
2) My motherboard software gives me info about 89c
3) My bios build-in monitor says after 30 minute stress on prime95 (and fast restart to bios(i think 5-10s)) CPU temperature is 50c, and after few seconds it's already 30c.
Btw problem with memory OC disappeared, now it can be stressed on 2.99 and not get me to bsod clock watchdog timeout.
(first of all i decided to check cpu temp cause of this memory bsods)
And, as i said before, i never have any kind of issues with cpu overheating, never have bsod/overheat reboot or unreal perfomance issues in everyday daily/gaming/rendering usage. (I think i never have throttling longer then few secs before stresses).
Can this be just software inaccurate problem? And is this real problem for me?
 
There are no 7th Generation i7 Desktop processors with a base clock of 3.9 GHz. Respectfully, when quoting specifications, for accuracy, future reference and the benefit of other Members and readers, please refer to Intel's Processor Specifications website: Product Specifications - https://ark.intel.com/#@Processors

Base clock for the i7 7700K is 4.2 GHz: Intel® Core™ i7-7700K Processor - https://ark.intel.com/products/97129/Intel-Core-i7-7700K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4-50-GHz-

I see several issues here:

Never use overclocking software, or auto overclocking in BIOS. Either of these methods will apply significantly more Core voltage than necessary to maintain stability. More voltage increases Power consumption (Watts), which in turn increases Core temperatures. If you want to overclock properly, then you need to learn how to do it manually in BIOS, which will get you the best overclock at the lowest possible Core temperatures. There are several good Overclocking Guides available; I strongly recommend that you Google up at least three Guides and study them closely.

Here's the nominal operating range for Core temperature:

Core temperatures above 85°C are not recommended.

Core temperatures below 80°C are ideal.

Idle temperatures below 25°C are generally due to ambient temperatures below 22°C.

(1) Core temperatures increase and decrease instantly with changes in load. Intel’s specification for Digital Thermal Sensor (DTS) response time is 256 milliseconds, or about 1/4th of a second. There's no lengthy heat-up or cool-down time that can be readily observed by watching the numbers. Observing Core temperatures by seeing them on a graph is the best way to visualize actual thermal behavior over time:

Shown above from left to right: Prime95 v26.6 Small FFT's, Prime95 v26.6 Blend, Linpack and IntelBurn Test.

(2) Although surprising and disappointing, motherboard software such as AI Suite is often inaccurate due to poor coding for a wide variety of hardware, including processors. As I mentioned in my previous post, many monitoring utilities mis-label or mis-assign various thermal sensors on the motherboard and processor. For best accuracy and greater detail, I again highly recommend that you use Hardware Info - https://www.hwinfo.com/download.php

(3) As mentioned above in item (1), Core temperatures change much too quickly to see any remaining hint of load temperatures in the time required to enter BIOS. Also, processor temperature in BIOS is usually higher than in Windows at idle, because BIOS boots the processor without power saving features and at higher Core voltages to ensure that it will initialize under any conditions.

It's puzzling that your "idle" temperature in Windows is 18 to 20°C above ambient, which is considerably higher than it should be for 22 to 25°C ambient temperature and only 1% CPU Utilization in Windows Task Manager. It would make sense if it was instead "30-38c on 1% load and 40-45c in BIOS". Did you perhaps inadvertently transpose the numbers? Did you set a fan curve that's too slow at idle?

(4) Your CRYORIG M9i is a 92 millimeter fan class cooler, which is adequate at stock, but very marginal for anything more than a mild overclock on a i7 7700K that hasn't been delidded. Having delidded a 7700K overclocked to 5.0GHz at 1.368 Vcore on a 240mm H105 liquid cooler, I can assure you that an overclocked non-delidded 7700K is difficult to properly cool. So it's critical to use manual Vcore and LLC settings in BIOS, among several other settings.

Also, when starting a Forum Thread, please always provide your complete system specs, including ambient temperature, so we don't proceed on false assumptions. Since this Thread concerns processor temperature problems, it would've been very helpful had you mentioned exactly which cooler you're running. "Radiator" implies liquid cooling; "fins" or "heat pipes" imply air cooling.

Sensing thermal performance by touch is like feeling a fireplace from 3 meters. Since hundreds of millions of nanometer scale transistors are densely packaged into a tiny Die, heat dissipates over relatively large areas and thermal gradients to the cooler, about 3 millimeters from the Cores. (3 millimeters = 3,000,000 nanometers).

Although some heat dissipates to the substrate, socket and motherboard, most heat dissipates to the cooler through several thermal gradients; Cores > Die > internal TIM (or solder) > IHS > external TIM > cooler. Even at 100% workload nothing will feel hot; exhaust airflow, heat pipes, cooling fins, radiator or water block will feel warm, and liquid cooling tubes will have a minimal temperature differential.

If you seriously want to understand processor temperatures, then as darkbreeze already recommended, you need to read: Intel Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1800828/intel-temperature-guide.html

CT :sol:
 
Solution