luciferano
Honorable
notuptome2004 :
It cvost Nintendo let alone IBM way to much money to re purpose the Broadway based CPU as it is so dang old it would not be cable of speeds over 1ghz let alone does not have the architectur to be able to be a Multi-core based chip because the G3 chips were year before Multi-core and it dont have the supporting info structure in it to support that stuff.
Any CPU, regardless of the architecture's age, would be using newer processes than back then, so much higher clock frequencies are to be expected.
GHz is not performance.
Any arch can be made into a multi-core CPU. The same buses that are used to communicate with the memory or anything else can be used to link different CPUs and/or different cores and this is exactly what was done with some of the early dual-core CPUs and some early forms of many other core count CPUs even up to recently where AMD's 12/16 core CPUs all use two distinct CPU dies that are simply linked through the Hyper Transport buses with the chipset(s). Older examples could include Pentium D and Core 2 Quad (Netburst dual-core CPUs and quad-core Core 2 CPUs that had two dies that communicate along the FSB, a bus that was on CPUs from like ten years before them). Neither of them needed architectural changes from the single core CPUs that I'm aware of.
Beyond that, IBM/Nintendo could have (assuming that they actually used Broadway) modified the architecture rather than using a copy of older Broadway CPUs, so they could have modified the architecture to have native multi-core support instead of needing multiple single-core dies.