Yes, I think this is a bit of a marketing ploy. But I'm not sure and would love to know the technical answers. I was searching for a socket with current protection to protect my computer from overvoltage. But the "Protects from lightning" claim seemed exaggerated to me and made me think it was a marketing tactic. I am no Tesla, but I am sure there is nothing on earth that can tolerate lightning except the ground. "Protects from lightning...." Isn't that <Mod Edit>? If I wanted to be protected from lightning, I would install a lightning protection antenna on my building and connect it to the ground. (Lightning rod)
Secondly, I don't think surge protector sockets can really guarantee this. Because there is no way to prove otherwise and you can't blame the manufacturer for it. Also, the plug in my room is connected to the building and apartment insurance. In other words, it is connected to two fuses in total, and in case of high current, the electricity is automatically cut off... This is a standard.
Third the voltage problem... If my UPS on the computer is good, it should already be constantly regulating voltage fluctuations. It should send the electricity to the motherboard or CPU at the ideal level as needed. Isn't that the purpose of a PSU anyway? And if a quality PSU can't do that, why am I paying so much for it?
Now let's think about the journey of electricity from the power grid to the motherboard... Roughly speaking, electricity is generated in the main distribution facility and is grounded and sent to a transformer in the local area. Large fuses are used in the main transformer in the neighborhood to send electricity to the houses, and there is another fuse in the houses. In addition, the electricity passing through this fuse also passes through another fuse within the apartment. Finally, it is sent to the PSU, and the PSU regulates the voltage to power components such as the motherboard or CPU HDD. What I mean is that the components inside the computer go through certain protection stages before being supplied with electricity.
In this case, isn't it an exaggeration to claim that a surge protector is absolutely necessary? If I am wrong please I want to know the technical answer.
NOTE
I have also come across some claims that surge protector sockets do not work their devices and damage them. There are those who say that it can even cause a fire, and there are those who say that even if everything is fine and necessary, it should be replaced every 1 or 2 years to guarantee surge protection. In short, these contradictory claims, when taken together, led me to believe that it was unnecessary. But I could be wrong, and I'm technically open to persuasion.
Secondly, I don't think surge protector sockets can really guarantee this. Because there is no way to prove otherwise and you can't blame the manufacturer for it. Also, the plug in my room is connected to the building and apartment insurance. In other words, it is connected to two fuses in total, and in case of high current, the electricity is automatically cut off... This is a standard.
Third the voltage problem... If my UPS on the computer is good, it should already be constantly regulating voltage fluctuations. It should send the electricity to the motherboard or CPU at the ideal level as needed. Isn't that the purpose of a PSU anyway? And if a quality PSU can't do that, why am I paying so much for it?
Now let's think about the journey of electricity from the power grid to the motherboard... Roughly speaking, electricity is generated in the main distribution facility and is grounded and sent to a transformer in the local area. Large fuses are used in the main transformer in the neighborhood to send electricity to the houses, and there is another fuse in the houses. In addition, the electricity passing through this fuse also passes through another fuse within the apartment. Finally, it is sent to the PSU, and the PSU regulates the voltage to power components such as the motherboard or CPU HDD. What I mean is that the components inside the computer go through certain protection stages before being supplied with electricity.
In this case, isn't it an exaggeration to claim that a surge protector is absolutely necessary? If I am wrong please I want to know the technical answer.
NOTE
I have also come across some claims that surge protector sockets do not work their devices and damage them. There are those who say that it can even cause a fire, and there are those who say that even if everything is fine and necessary, it should be replaced every 1 or 2 years to guarantee surge protection. In short, these contradictory claims, when taken together, led me to believe that it was unnecessary. But I could be wrong, and I'm technically open to persuasion.
Last edited by a moderator: