It isn't if the chair is compatible: It is why the monitor has such a high sensitivity to local static discharge.
Office chair ESD discharge has been known for decades and is one reason why the USB ports have such a high ESD capability (upward to 15KV and higher). There were even some guys from MIT who wanted this "chair discharge" outlined as a standard ESD source/test but it was rejected for some reason. When you sit down or back up, there are a series of micro discharge events that creates a ton of EMI in the local environment (both E fields and H fields). Foam based chairs are bad, but nylon chair as astounding in their ESD buildup. You can buy ESD discharge spray which is actually a mildly conductive salt that you are putting on the surface of the chair fabric.
All good electronic industry testing standards require doing EMI and RF immunity testing, which includes ESD discharge testing. If this monitor has a discharge sensitivity from a half meter away (few feet), it is definitely not going to handle having a direct discharge that these tests will subject it. Some of the best tests are the IEC static discharge tests, but the EMI part would typically also catch this issue. And are there any other monitors that have this issue?
So, in essence, the monitor design was not tested well or possibly not at all. This is the difference between a good high quality monitor and an inexpensive monitor/TV/gadget that you find on the Internet.
When you sit down in an office chair, you should learn to touch the desk surface first to spread out the chair charge generated into the the desk capacitance. I do this with my keyboard drawer. Haven't zapped a USB drive or port in years since doing that step.