Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.gateway2000 (
More info?)
Yes, and it's all very curious as to why Intel imposed the 512MB limit on the
815 chipsets when the older 440BX would handle 1GB (4x256MB) of low density
DIMMs. The Intel-made 440BX chipset boards had no more than 3 DIMM slots,
limiting them to 768MB max, compared to other brands which handled 4 DIMMs.
Actually, this is very much a replay of what happened with the earlier
430-series chipsets. The NX could address up to 512MB, if memory serves me
correctly. (My own memory is low-density, for sure.) Then all the Triton chips
were limited to 128MB. The rationale was to make the Pentium Pro look better
with greater memory addressing. But what on earth was Intel thinking with the
440 to 815 transition? ... Ben Myers
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:18:30 GMT, "SR" <nojunkmail@my.com> wrote:
>
>The 440BX chipset and the 810 chipset are limited to modules with =
>128Mbit or smaller chips--what you are referring to as "low density." =
>But, the 815 chipset does support modules with 256Mbit chips. The 815 =
>chipset will support 256MB DIMMs with eight 32Mx8(256Mbit) chips, and =
>512MB DIMMs with sixteen 32Mx8 chips. Although, the 815 chipset does =
>have an imposed, total memory limit of 512MB--system memory above 512MB =
>will be ignored.
>
>
>
>
>
>"Edward J. Neth" <ejn63@netscape.com> wrote in message =
>news:BIlec.53225$VV1.40445@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
>> Most of these use either a 440BX or i815 chipset, neither of which =
>will
>> support a high-density DIMM. 256 MBytes is the max per DIMM, and they =
>must
>> be low density (16-chip).
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> "JE" <Zeke@legs.com> wrote in message
>> news:CWkec.53218$5G1.31503@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
>> > Hi Ed and thanks. Is there someway to tell if the 512 will or won't =
>work.
>> > I have a M800 Gateway, PIII and I can get a 512 module quite =
>reasonable.
>>=20
>>=20
>