The real question is what socket is it going to use? I am assuming it might use more than 2011, especially considering that it will be using DDR4 which has a very different approach compared to DDR3.
I just finished building a Z77 machine December 2012. I will wait for DDR4, PCIe 4, USB 4.0 and SATA4 supported nativly on the same board before i upgrade. So i will skip Z97 and most likely ZX7 (if that the next name).
I am still kicking myself for not wating for Z87 to get all 6 native Intel SATA3 ports instead of just 2 on my Z77.
wow I never would have thought when I bought my Q6600 that it would take this long almost another 7 years for Intel to come out with a 8 core desktop chip.
I will upgrade when they come down in price or wait for skylake.
Iam happy with z77 and the 3770k wih all fans disable (on only powersupply) i get 45W (idle) at stock speeds. I will buy another chip when I get 30 or less. I have the config. 1 - maximum OC 2 - Power saving. I can play with the havik 140 @ 4400mhz only with power supply fan. but when set 4.6ghz shutdown in few seconds after startup
The thing that interests me is the difference between the K and X series. K if we keeping with tradition will have something(s) disabled, but what? X would be full feature but as OC'able as the K?
There goes the hopes and dreams of bringing an $500 8 core part. Very disappointing they are keeping it at the $1,000 price range. It isn't worth that and given every single 6 core part in the Extreme lineup technically is 8 cores with 2 disabled it's very insulting. The only positive is that it'll allow 6 core parts to go mainstream outside the regular high-end lineup by pushing a $300 6 core part out and expanding the LGA2011 segment.
other than video and autocad.......what does a 8 core or 4 core core do better than a 2 core cpu? And Jesus H Christ.....1000 for a cpu? I remember when intel tried to do that with the Pentium 4 extreme edition.
other than video and autocad.......what does a 8 core or 4 core core do better than a 2 core cpu? And Jesus H Christ.....1000 for a cpu? I remember when intel tried to do that with the Pentium 4 extreme edition.
Do you live under a rock? Even the majority of gaming computers today are quad core. There is a substantial boost of the quad cores today vs. the Core 2 Quad age when comparing each to dual cores. Especially with the "Turbo Boost" clocks in the CPUs today (which enable when less cores are used) have a higher clock speed than that of the older dual cores.
wow I never would have thought when I bought my Q6600 that it would take this long almost another 7 years for Intel to come out with a 8 core desktop chip.
I will upgrade when they come down in price or wait for skylake.
wow I never would have thought when I bought my Q6600 that it would take this long almost another 7 years for Intel to come out with a 8 core desktop chip.
I will upgrade when they come down in price or wait for skylake.
they did you a favor, no apps have started using much of 8 cores till recently and beyond 4 cores are still not utilized in most apps, so your getting better overall performance with a fast quad core.
wow I never would have thought when I bought my Q6600 that it would take this long almost another 7 years for Intel to come out with a 8 core desktop chip.
I will upgrade when they come down in price or wait for skylake.