-Fran-
Illustrious
Counterpoint to the "gaming is not an important market" argument.
I will absolutely agree it's smaller than Enterprise as a whole, but saying "is not important" or "it doesn't matter" is a farcry from reality. Remember the gaming industry is still massive. ~300BN massive if nVidia's CES presentation is to be believed. So there's a lot of money in that pot to tap into. Intel, AMD and nVidia (among the plethora of AIBs and other companies) wouldn't spend so much money investing in "gaming" if there wasn't a lot of money to be made. Again, I do agree it is smaller than Enterprise as a whole, but by no means insignificant to dismiss it.
AMD choosing the Enterprise over the regular consumer (and specific "gaming") space must feel really painful to them. They are losing money by doing so as they can't keep up producing enough products to serve all verticals, while Intel can and is. Same with nVidia on the GPU side.
I hope that makes sense to everyone...
Regards.
I will absolutely agree it's smaller than Enterprise as a whole, but saying "is not important" or "it doesn't matter" is a farcry from reality. Remember the gaming industry is still massive. ~300BN massive if nVidia's CES presentation is to be believed. So there's a lot of money in that pot to tap into. Intel, AMD and nVidia (among the plethora of AIBs and other companies) wouldn't spend so much money investing in "gaming" if there wasn't a lot of money to be made. Again, I do agree it is smaller than Enterprise as a whole, but by no means insignificant to dismiss it.
AMD choosing the Enterprise over the regular consumer (and specific "gaming") space must feel really painful to them. They are losing money by doing so as they can't keep up producing enough products to serve all verticals, while Intel can and is. Same with nVidia on the GPU side.
I hope that makes sense to everyone...
Regards.