The scheduled forum maintenance has now been completed. If you spot any issues, please report them here in this thread. Thank you!
The only way this makes sense to me is if Meteor Lake is going to makeup the low-end of the desktop Gen 14 model line. Then, Arrow Lake will replace Raptor Lake, as the upper-end desktop die.
Otherwise, doing three desktop CPU launches in just over a year's time makes almost zero sense. Therefore, if you're planning on building a high-end machine within the next 6 months, I'd take a gamble and use Raptor Refresh.
That's just my take, though. Make your own decision and don't cry to me if I'm wrong!
: O
The ones we know of are 6 P-core + 8 E-core, but I think there could be other compute tiles than the one so far leaked? The 6+8 configuration matches the larger die of the Alder Lake P-series (i.e. laptop-oriented) models. For upper/mid-range laptops, expect core-count parity (except for the extra 2x ultra-efficiency cores, in the SoC tile).Wild, I thought Meteor Lake was cancelled, it's just a 6 core part? Might be about equal to a 13th gen i7..
The real ones will be waiting for the full range of Arrow Lake to hit.
The thing is that the tiles made on older nodes are a lot cheaper. Depending on the size of its iGPU, I think cost won't necessarily be such an issue.the main tiles all get connected via EMIB, which appears to stack the tiles on top of a 22nm FinFET layer (now called Intel 16). It all sounds very complex and expensive as well. I can’t help but think the cost of a single Meteor Lake processor might be twice as expensive as a single RPL-R!
Stress tests will still make them go to the maximum power draw they are capable of, so again unless the new node is somehow worse and can't support the same level of power, results will look the same because they only look at peak power draw under stress on unlimited platforms.What about all the non-K processors out there? Aren't those supposed to be non-overclockable? There are plenty of reviews and benchmarks of them to be found.
LOL. Way to turn this into something it's not.>>So, yes, I'm saying that we (consumers) won't see Arrow Lake CPUs and supporting boards for desktop in '24.
>Just because you arbitrarily have decided not to believe Intel? Okay. I'll remember that.
What you should remember is that twisting other people's words and belittling them to win petty online argument is sophomoric,
What I've always taken care to say is that they're launching 3 architectures in about 1 year's time. In my book, it makes little difference if we're talking about Arrow Lake-S shipping in November 2024 or January 2025. It's still awfully close.I never said I don't believe Intel will launch Arrow Lake in '24, only that "launch" and "retail availability" (for desktops) are different animals.
The thing is, all of the boards for Raptor-Refresh are basically on the market, already. There's no new chipset for it, so you don't need new boards.That's in addition to the difficulty of convincing board partners to launch supporting products (CPUs don't run by themselves) for two different platforms at the same time, knowing cannibalization will happen.
Except, the desktop variant was rumored not to feature a big iGPU. That is rumored not to happen until Arrow Lake.the main sales pitch will be the improved iGPU,
Depends on how you regard their GNA (Gaussian & Neural Accelerator) or AMD's Ryzen AI:and most importantly, its NPU, which would be the first for an x86 chip.
It's technically interesting, which he always likes, and he's incentivized to generate interest. I don't care about hype - I care about data. Let's wait and see how it actually performs.Ian is excited about MTL, which is one (of many) indication that MTL will be a "big deal" (read: not a niche part).
It's not going to hold a candle to big dGPUs, so you'd better tamp down those expectations.What I'm personally excited about is to see now the NPU will improve Stable Diffusion performance, along with LLMs-on-PCs.
what im understanding with all this is that if i want to build a purely gaming pc, i should basically make a steam deck desktop....
Microsoft ai copilot etc isnt something i want at all...
Intel seems confused too, maybe they should drop to 2 year intervals for hardware releases ?
I really dont see the point of yearly refreshes of everything.
Now that I have read all of this and think about it more, I bet you are right. Meteor Lake was going to be laptop only, but now they say deektop too, but I bet you are right.... No high end 15900k- equivalent. If you build a high end PC for gaming or high-end demanding productivity work, then your choice is build with Raptor Lake refresh now or wait a year for Arrow Lake, which will be the big generational desktop platform change (in many ways). I'm not a gamer but need lots of computational power (and because I want the latest and greatest and it is time for me to build). So I am building in Oct with the Raptor Lake refresh i9 14900K. I can't wait a ytear for Arrow Lake (but I wish I could or would).The ones we know of are 6 P-core + 8 E-core, but I think there could be other compute tiles than the one so far leaked? The 6+8 configuration matches the larger die of the Alder Lake P-series (i.e. laptop-oriented) models. For upper/mid-range laptops, expect core-count parity (except for the extra 2x ultra-efficiency cores, in the SoC tile).
Again, I'm betting they'll go after the lower-end desktops with this. Like the corporate 65W mini-ITX market, for instance. In that case, having only 6 P-cores isn't so much of a liability, especially if Crestmont (the Meteor Lake E-core) increases IPC as much as I expect.
You are right of course. But I'm building high end in Oct w Raptor Lake Refresh 14900K and the 4090 GPU. When Arrow Lake comes out for high-end desktop, it will be a big generational platform, power and computational change and do AI much better too. I will regret building now a year from now. But so be it. I don't think Meteor Lake will be high-end desktop. It will be the lower levels of desktop which is great for people not building or buying at the top-end.The real question about any upgrade is do you have any good reason for it or do you just want to try something new? For example, I just upgraded my trusty old 1070 for 4070 because I wanted to play Cyberpunk 2077. I kept my old CPU and mobo because I got the results I needed. So if it is matter of want instead of need anytime is a good time (as long as you have cash to burn). If you want to balance need vs. want the best time to upgrade is when you start experiencing slowdowns IMHO.
Thanks! That was interesting. Tom's reported what they think Intel announced concerning Meteor Lake for the desktop. This guy says no way Meteor Lake will be on the desktop at the top-end level. OK. I'm building with Raptor Lake Refresh and not waiting a year for Arrow Lake. Meteor Lake not happening for high-end desktop. It's either Raptor Lake now or Arrow Lake a year (or more) from now for the high-end desktop build.
Its not that confusing. We just dont know which of Intels announced products will be cancelled or delayed indefinitely. I am betting Arrow and lunar get delayed/killed/merged/excused. MTL refresh on Intel 4++ will be awesome! Intel had customer slides with RLR for 9 months and never admitted the product existed LOL.I'm confused. I was going to build next month with 14th Gen Raptor Lake Refresh because for months we have been saying that Meteor Lake was laptop only, and that the big generational change for desktops would be Arrow Lake probably about a year from now. So we get Raptor Lake Refresh now, them Meteor Lake a few months from now and then Arrow Lake almost immediately after that?
Three major high-end chip generations for the high-end desktop inside of a year?
Maybe I should not build now with Raptor Lake Refresh. Man oh Man! Why spend 5 grand building a top end PC now when two major upgrades are coming in the next few months - Meteor Lake (which we thought was laptop only) and Arrow Lake as generational-level improvements to Raptor Lake.
Raptor Lake is on the tail end of old tech and Meteor Lake will have a new socket and chipset with completely new generational change level motherboards. Then Arrow Lake almost immediately after that which is a generational change. Why build now with top-end Raptor Lake stuff? It made sense since Arrow Lake was a year away. But now we have Meteor Lake for the Desktop staring us in the face.
The mix of microarchitectures on the desktop isn't something that I personally can recall. We've seen where they used an older, higher-clocking Skylake-derived CPU for the HX laptop models, however.I am confused that you all seem like Intel has never done this before. Seems about like what they did to us with Gen 10-11-12, no?
My take is they had trouble getting Meteor Lake to clock high enough to match/exceed Raptor Lake. That's when they killed off the desktop version and opted to simply refresh Raptor Lake. It must've come as a late surprise, as rumors only surfaced about it several months ago.This is very interesting. RLR didnt show up in intel public roadmaps. If they release MTL Desktop it in 2024.... when is Arrow lake coming? The will "start production in 2024" but for MTL, it was a year from start production to sales. and Lunar lake? Does anyone believe Intel will deliver 5 client products in 2-3 years (RL, RLR, MTL, ARL, LL) ? So far the only one we can buy is the OG RL.
At the bare minimum, they could probably at least do a respin of it on Intel 3 - especially, since it's only the CPU tile they'd need to redo.MTL refresh on Intel 4++ will be awesome!
I would agree with that.I think Meteor Lake for desktops may end up like a niche product. "Oh, you want better integrated graphics with lower power use, on a desktop? Here you go