It's damage control, in the sense that Intel is getting a lot of bad PR and warranty returns. So, the damage to Intel is real.Sending a loose guideline to mobo makers to implement whenever they want and however they want can't really be called damage control
Trying to change the subject won't make this problem go away.,we have seen how real damage control looks with the exploding ryzen cpus, one agesa update after the other and new bioses left and right.
After a handful of known 7800X3D failures, AMD did issue firmware patches to their partners. They did not actually explode, in the sense of breaking into pieces, or causing a violent shock capable of collateral damage, and it wasn't "ryzen cpus", writ large.
Your characterization is sloppy to the point of seeming disingenuous. Unless your goal is to misinform others about the issue, I suggest you be more specific about it and not go beyond the established facts.