..so Intel cut corners, between the chip and heat spreader which results in poor heat dissipation, not good. While I do not overclock as I only work in 3D CG this is a matter of concern. as it will still run at higher temps than the 7700 evne at stock clock speeds.
It is nice to see benchmarks for workstation use and not just gaming (I wish the same would be done for consumer grade GPU cards as most enthusiast 3D artists do not have a budget to afford the far more expensive Pro grade cards). This is where the 7900 seems to shine. This may polarise the two companies with AMD supporting the gaming community while Intel moves more to the graphics/scientific enthusiast workstation community.
One question not answered here is does it support older versions of the Windows OS like Skylake-S does? From what I gathered in the review to use Turbo Boost 3.0 one will need W10 but if you don't overclock, can you still use W7/8.1? For myself, that would be a major selling point as W10 reserves a noticeable portion of VRAM on Consumer grade GPU cards (not on pro cards like the Firepro and Quadro series), which along with MS's force fed updating policy are two major reasons I am avoiding it (there are other reasons as well).
Another is PCI lanes and memory channels. Ryzen architecture s limited to dual channel memory support only and the 7-1800 supports 24 PCI lanes ves the 44 of the 7900x. The former may not be as important for gaming which is more GPU intensive but it is in 3D rendering, especially when working with engines which do not support GPU rendering as well as computation tasks,. Furthermore the X-299 boards support up to 128 GB of memory (8 x 16 GB Quad channel), a nice optimal amount for a serious graphics workstation.
Of course until AMD's Threadripper (and awful name for a workstation CPU), is out we are in a "wait and see" mode. Hopefully in the meantime some of the issues with Skylake-X will get ironed out as the dust settles (particularly heat dissipation which may require a new closed loop cooler design). in the coming months. What remains to be seen with Threadripper is memory channel and OS support. If it follows the Ryzen model and does not support any OS below W10, and Skylake-X (non overclocked) does, the extra cost will be worth it. If neither do it's back to the drawing board, hoping either the Broadwell CPUS come down in price. or going back to dual 8 core Sandy Bridge Xeons for my next workstation.