I think I can agree that the x3 720 is a better choice than the e7400 at the given price level, however, every other post suggesting a e7400 always ends up going in the direction of the e5400 which is a less expensive processor @ $96 on the egg and when OCed has basically the same performance as an OCed e7400 (-1 MB in cache = no biggie). Depending where your budget is, it is definitely worth a look to save cash and potentially get you up there to a better graphics card...
In terms of "fanboyism" all I have seen on this post is a bunch of dude's playing ookie cookie with the 720...
My question to AMD is why does it take 3 processors to match the core 2 e8400's performance? It seems very sketchy to me... I have read on this post several times that the 720 when "OC'ed" beats the e8400, but is the e8400 also OCed during these benchmarks?? I have heard that the e8400 can reach 4.0 ghz easily. And depending upon usage, games don't show a noticeable improvement above 3.4ghz but other progs will...
I have been in the same predicament as xserver (OP) for quite some time with no resolution on a processor... I really like the price and 3rd core on the 720, I can't go e5400 b/c I want virtualization (check out youtube vids) so I'm stuck between the e8400 and 720 while trying to find money for the q6600.