Intel Makes Mobile Play With Android Reference Design At IDF 2014

Status
Not open for further replies.

amk-aka-Phantom

Distinguished
Mar 10, 2011
3,004
0
20,860
significant cost in switching to a very different instruction set such as x86

Oh really? So recompiling Android for x86 is "significant cost"? Because that's all it takes. Apps run on a Java VM, they don't care. BS, through and through. Asus already has Android tablets running on x86 Atoms and the only problematic apps there are a few games - probably using that feature which allows to use some C code in Android applications for performance-critical parts.

Intel's having difficulties because market is flooded with cheap Mediatek junk and uneducated buyers shout "OMG QUAD CORE" when they see a MT6582M and think it's as good as Snapdragon 800 or Atom Z3770 and better than A6x (because it only has TWO cores!!!1). Of course it's difficult to enter the market in such stupid conditions. But it's Intel we're talking about. Where did PowerPC go? Where's AMD? Where will nVIDIA's low-end GPUs soon end up? Irrelevaland, that's where. Broadwell-Y, Moorefield and Cherry Trail will set things straight. It's indeed really just up to device makers. Samsung wants to push their own SoCs and Qualcomm wouldn't want to lose the market, but a LOT of manufacturers will switch if it suits them. Right now Intel chips end up in a lot of Asus tablets as well as devices by no-name Asian brands (which sell like hotcakes due to low price and high demand) but soon everyone will want an Intel chip. It's great even from a marketing point of view - uneducated customers will be familiar with the Intel brand (even my grandma knows what Intel is) and would be more inclined to buy the device with their CPU. It's just a matter of time. Big boys are here, ARM, back to your routers, Raspberries and smartwatches... until Intel decides it wants their chips in those, too.
 

ldo

Reputable
Aug 21, 2014
21
0
4,510
Why doesn’t Intel mark ARM chips, instead of stubbornly trying to force x86 onto a market that doesn’t want it? Then their mobile division could actually show a profit.
 

swordrage

Distinguished
Jul 4, 2012
64
1
18,635
Why doesn’t Intel mark ARM chips, instead of stubbornly trying to force x86 onto a market that doesn’t want it? Then their mobile division could actually show a profit.
Because currently "x86 is intel". AMD doesn't stand a chance. Ii would look like a submission like "Hey guys, we can't optimize our product any more. Let's make your stuff."
 

amk-aka-Phantom

Distinguished
Mar 10, 2011
3,004
0
20,860
Why doesn’t Intel mark ARM chips, instead of stubbornly trying to force x86 onto a market that doesn’t want it? Then their mobile division could actually show a profit.

The hell? Who says the market doesn't want it? x86 tablets with full-blown (not that RT rubbish) Windows 8 are incredible, they're perfect for both entertainment (Civilization V or Heroes of Might and Magic hot-seat? YES PLEASE) and work (would LOVE one for my sysadmin stuff), and you can run Linux on them easily as well (Surface Pro 3 boots Ubuntu without any hassle, lol). Intel is going to rid us of ARM mess where you are at the mercy of the manufacturer releasing source code for 3rd party firmwares or not and give us mobile devices that can run the operating systems we are all used to (Windows and NORMAL Linux distros). The market doesn't just want it, it BEGS for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.