[citation][nom]caedenv[/nom]So now that they are getting out CPUs that hardly need a fan (even my i7 stays plenty cool unless under a heavy load at low fan settings, and even then the dinky stock cooler was adequate... though I still replaced it) they are finally getting to the point where there is really intelligent fan control. Where was this tech back in the days of the P3 and P4 CPUs where even the entry level offerings could cook you a nice breakfast and warm the water for your shower in the morning?[/citation]Your "dinky stock cooler" is still MUCH better than the stock cooler in the P3 and most of the P4 era. P3s actually didn't dissipate all that much heat. A P3 with a modern cooler (and maybe an integrated heatspreader) would be pretty chill, even at those ancient processes.
Anyway, this design isn't about cutting back fan speeds. It's about what is best for maximum efficiency. It might actually result in your fan running FASTER in some scenarios compared to your existing "dumb" temperature-controlled variable speed configuration. The idea is that keeping the processor at ideal temperatures can help keep leakage under control, which results in overall better power efficiency.
This is NOT about making the fan quieter or the CPU run slower. It's actually a good idea, although don't expect miraculous gains in power consumption. For a laptop though, every bit helps. For a desktop I couldn't really care less.