While I do agree with the conclusions made in this article, (that CPU is an amazing value) I disagree with the methods used to achieve that conclusion.
1) The use of a GTX Titan is absurd.
Nobody is going to pair a $75 CPU with a $1000 GFX card.
The testing should have been done with a more realistic, and balanced, configuration. Something between the r7-260, and the GTX 760, would have provided more useful/realistic results.
2) More CPU's, of roughly the same value, should have been included.
You had an i3, and an i5, to compare with. Why no FX CPU's?
With the $30 difference in platform costs, the FX-6300 is AMD's closest competitor in terms of cost, and it is the most popular of AMD's overclockable offerings. It would seem like a natural choice....