Intel Planning to Ship Multiplier Unlocked CPUs?

[Marcus Yam]

Forget all that messing with bus speeds; what you really want is an unlocked multiplier!

Intel Planning to Ship Multiplier Unlocked CPUs? : Read more

 

[Tindytim]

I sometimes wonder if Intel if punishing me for buying a 1366 board. Excuse me, I'm going to curl up into a ball and cry.

 

[ktasley]

so whats the 15-870s? Low power I am assuming from the clock speed?

 

[polly the parrot]

Intel should've had the 920s unlocked...but obviously they wouldn't have made a dime from the overpriced 940s and 965s.

 

[jenesuispasbavard]

Is it also going to be priced like the i7-870?

 

[random_yggdrasil]

Well this is some news I like =] I would like some nice price tags to go along with the news tho

 

[saaiello]

LOL this is gonna be expensive cant wait to see what has to be mortgaged to buy this one. :lol:

 

[matt87_50]

yeah, just a shame that the 870 is already a massive ripoff compared to the 860. so clearly they are just making mini extreme editions for each platform.

 

[freename]

I'd be very surprised if Intel actually shipped an affordable multiplier unlocked cpu that had any kind of legs for OC'ing.

Why would they bother adding more performance per $ when they're essentially competing with themselves in the top performance levels? All they'd do is stop someone with OC'ing know-how from buying a more expensive chip.

The only way I could ever see this happening is if AMD's next chip is a market-changer.

 

[Tindytim]

[citation][nom]freename[/nom]Why would they bother adding more performance per $ when they're essentially competing with themselves in the top performance levels? All they'd do is stop someone with OC'ing know-how from buying a more expensive chip.[/citation]

Just because the 975 has an unlocked multiplier doesn't mean everyone who bought it was going to use it for overclocking. The fact of the matter is, when a 920 ships it's only guaranteed to work at 2.6 Ghz. Some chips will go much higher, and other won't, but that's not intel's problem. If you were building something that you wanted to be sure was stable at 3.333 Ghz, you could take the chance with an 920 and void the warrenty, or you could spend the extra money for stability and some peace of mind on the 975.

You or I may not care as much, but then again, very few of us were going to be buying a $1000 dollar processor when we could get about the same for a third of the price. Point being, most of us aren't going to be spending that much on a processor anyway.

 

[JohnnyLucky]

The escalating prices are taking their toll. It doesn't look like I'll be doing any upgrading for quite a while.

 

[kewlx]

I ran my 920 at 3.65 Ghz and the ram at 1456 Mhz for 24 hours and 2 mins on prime95 with everything at 100% and it ran without errors. so I would still say the 920's are best though I got lucky with getting a D0 version

 

[dco]

it would be awesome if they did release some more unlocked multiplier CPU's.

But in no does it reference that in the info provided above all you've said is its "speculated"......

 

[3Ball]

Good news if they start doing it for some of the cheaper processors. For now I will stick with my $200 860 @ 3.8ghz (Got it at Microcenter if anyone is curious).

 

[7amood]

if AMD's next mid-ranged hexa-core can be unlocked, cheap, and power-efficient, all in comparison to Intel, then am Intel no more.
I can build myself an AMD that is half my 1800$ Intel and as powerful.
I had enough with Intel games...

 

[HavoCnMe]

This is great speculation, but. Even if Intel decides to release some of these processors unlocked, they will still hold the extreme edition name and price tag.

 

[Shadow703793]

There was an unlocked budget CPU that was unlocked in the C2D era, aka E6500K. Unfortunately, this was available only in China

 

[Guest]

Hey Intel - Throw us a bone! -

AMD is (at least) a generation back - The Phenom II is barely a match for the C2D, so forget about going head to head with Bloomfield, Clarkdale, or heaven forbid Sandy Bridge.

We pay what Intel says we must pay, at the top end, Intel has a monopoly.

Unlocked chips would be a great goodwill gesture.

 

[matt_b]

AMD...premium price for their unlocked CPU's? Compared to an Intel Extreme, I think not. Besides, unless I missed it, where is the concrete pricing here? Intel has had unlocked chips for YEARS, but the pricing is the only point we are looking for - being not mentioned here makes the "high hopes" over this article non-existent! At this point, merely "rumors and speculation" is all we have to go on.

 

[zodiacfml]

unlocked processors are best for power efficiency.

 

[christop]

I still want a 920 after I trash my old e8400.

 

[volks1470]

"Those in search of such processor have to turn to AMD's Black Edition CPUs or Intel's Extreme Editions, both of which come with premium price tags"

AMD Premium price tag? Really? You can't even compare the value of two, $1000 premium to a $200 premium.

 

[joe gamer]

Damn you Intel, where are my 32nm Quad cores? Aaargh I want to give you money but you keep bullshitting.

 

[Nutjob]

This sounds too good to be true, but I really hope it is true.

 

[ream]

[citation][nom]Joe Gamer[/nom]Damn you Intel, where are my 32nm Quad cores? Aaargh I want to give you money but you keep bullshitting.[/citation]

Yeah, it is said they plan it for 2011!!! Which means that if you bought i7 920 back in 2008, after three years you will still have the best CPU...

I am disappointed in Intel's progress. Sad to experience a development that stops for 3 years! It is on the other hand even a step back, because of the LGA1156. Instead of pushing the performance further, they created a cheaper platform that no one would really need over the 1366. It would be really better and cheaper for Intel itself to lower the price for the 1366. AMD is also reason for this: it does not provide a good competition.