News Intel To Make Further Workforce Cuts in U.S. :Report

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted member 431422

Guest
Cutting staff while simultaneously having to pay an over $300 million dollar breakup fee to Tower.
And getting billions of dollars from the Chips act. If ChatGPT could develop processors I bet Intel and other companies would cut their engineer staff significantly.
 
When big Corps start cutting their R&D staff, unless it's literally incubation labs or some sort, it always paints a terrible picture to me: they're looking to mainstream and work on minimal "new" things and stick to whatever patented things they have. This usually smells like transition (see IBM).

That being said, this amount of people out of... What is it? 100K employees? It's not really significant enough to make any conclusions like that, but it still is sad to read about good talent being let go.

Regards.
 

JamesJones44

Reputable
Jan 22, 2021
704
649
5,760
And getting billions of dollars from the Chips act. If ChatGPT could develop processors I bet Intel and other companies would cut their engineer staff significantly.
Those two things are not related. The Chips Act money has to be used for the construction of their Ohio Fab as per the requirements in the Chips Act. The money can't be used for general R&D, operations, stock buybacks, break up fees, etc. (assuming the gov follows through with verifying the funds uses).
 
  • Like
Reactions: bit_user

bit_user

Polypheme
Ambassador
Remember, the US economy is "resilient"? Hiring is still going strong? Everyday I am seeing news of companies letting people go. Kind of contradictory.
Talk of the job market being "resilient" is based on overall statistics on the unemployment rate (which we know is underreported) and the number of unfilled positions (which I'm sure is overreported). It does not mean that hiring is equally strong in all sectors, or say anything about their layoff or turnover rates.
 

bit_user

Polypheme
Ambassador
Wishing the best to all affected. I hope this isn't simply an off-shoring exercise, but that's exactly the type of thing these corporations do.

One thing to consider is that having to provide health insurance for employees is a cost they don't have to bear almost anywhere else in the world. That further amplifies the cost disparities between US-based employees and those in other countries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.