News Intel's Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms the Ryzen AI 9 365 in user review — Alchemist+ offers a nice bump in synthetics, but gaming performance remai...

[bit_user]

I've never seen such numbers, but even if so, it was still useless, because they didn't even come close to the 3070's 3D performance, let alone the 3080.

Here's news coverage of the announcement:

https://www.anandtech.com/show/1730...bining-two-m1-maxes-for-even-more-performance
​

I can't really speak to the 3D performance aspect.

But it would certainly have affected the overall performance if the processor cores had access to all that bandwidth.

I haven't seen hard data on this, but I'd expect the CPU cores to have double the aggregate bandwidth as they have in the Max.

 

[thestryker]

I've never seen such numbers, but even if so, it was still useless, because they didn't even come close to the 3070's 3D performance, let alone the 3080.

https://www.eurogamer.net/digitalfo...ultra-and-m1-max-take-on-high-end-pc-hardware

150W 3080M is pretty close to 3070 FE performance wise. The only game tested which had a native client at the time is WoW. While there are certainly tons of asterisks involved with gaming on Apple silicon there is performance potential there it's just not being well utilized since they're not designed for it.

 

[bit_user]

The only game tested which had a native client at the time is WoW.

They note that 3D Wildlife Extreme was also a native app.

 

[Pigpig]

285H is 3nm product, it can support PCIe 5.0, AI 9 365 is 4nm product ,support PCIe 4.0.
if price is same, i prefer 285H.