- Jan 6, 2008
- 9,531
- 0
- 30,780
Intel's McAfee Security Arm Plans Job Cuts
- Thread starter exfileme
- Start date
- Status
jojesa
Glorious
- Dec 6, 2006
- 7,180
- 551
- 47,440
Around 90% of people that contacted me this year about malware issues, had McAfee as their security.
You cannot stay that long in business by selling false sense of security crap. If it wasn't for computer companies (ehem: Dell) forcing on it users no one will buy this garbage.
You cannot stay that long in business by selling false sense of security crap. If it wasn't for computer companies (ehem: Dell) forcing on it users no one will buy this garbage.
[citation][nom]outlw6669[/nom]More to the point, Microsoft's latest OS' are much more secure and offer free Anti-Virus.Unless Intel plans on implementing a chip level Anti-Virus solution, McAfee's consumer solutions are somewhat redundant.[/citation]
They should also focus on GPU-assisted viruses. Those things are virtually untouchable by current AVs, especially if they don't run on the CPU or system RAM at all.
They should also focus on GPU-assisted viruses. Those things are virtually untouchable by current AVs, especially if they don't run on the CPU or system RAM at all.
CaedenV
Splendid
- Jun 14, 2011
- 4,829
- 3
- 23,465
for years McAfee and Symantec pushed out bloatware that made people extremely interested in alternatives. The bloatware has been fixed, but there is so much free competition out there now!
Have you seen the prices for antivirus?!?!! $70+ for an antivirus suite? seriously? For something that is often beaten by free services? Even malwarebytes is $25 FOR LIFE, not per year, and that is a great one! If they sold their services for much cheaper they might stand a chance at gaining some market share again.
Win7/8/OSX/iOS/WP7/8/Android are all relatively secure out of the box now. It is not the Pre XP-SP2 days where just hooking up to the internet would get you a virus. You typically have to either click on something, or be specifically targeted in order to get an infection. On top of that web browsers tend to have warnings for bad sites/links, ISPs are filtering more and more content, and home routers are getting pretty good out of the box (and are super secure if you flash them with tomato or DD-WRT). Plus you have the major push for app stores which filter installable content, and a ton of pressure for applicaiton and web service providers to ensure that their product is relatively secure to begin with.
And also the largest sources of viruses was from illegally downloading music and movies which were infected. Now with so many legal free/cheap/affordable web sources this is nowhere near the issue that it use to be. And even some torrent sites are monitoring torrents to boot users that are infecting the pool.
Add to all of that Intel itself, who purchased McAfee specifically to implement security on a hardware level in order to better virturalize and compartmentalize environments so that the antivirus would eventually become irrelevant. McAfee's own work will undo their main product line! which is wierd to think about
There are just so many levels of security now, that it renders most use-cases for antivirus as obsolete today. It is not 100% secure or anything, and the internet is still a very scary place in some regards, but todays issues are on a higher level of security (with businesses and web services), and there is less and less focus on end-users as targets as their systems become more secure, and the users generally become more educated.
Have you seen the prices for antivirus?!?!! $70+ for an antivirus suite? seriously? For something that is often beaten by free services? Even malwarebytes is $25 FOR LIFE, not per year, and that is a great one! If they sold their services for much cheaper they might stand a chance at gaining some market share again.
Win7/8/OSX/iOS/WP7/8/Android are all relatively secure out of the box now. It is not the Pre XP-SP2 days where just hooking up to the internet would get you a virus. You typically have to either click on something, or be specifically targeted in order to get an infection. On top of that web browsers tend to have warnings for bad sites/links, ISPs are filtering more and more content, and home routers are getting pretty good out of the box (and are super secure if you flash them with tomato or DD-WRT). Plus you have the major push for app stores which filter installable content, and a ton of pressure for applicaiton and web service providers to ensure that their product is relatively secure to begin with.
And also the largest sources of viruses was from illegally downloading music and movies which were infected. Now with so many legal free/cheap/affordable web sources this is nowhere near the issue that it use to be. And even some torrent sites are monitoring torrents to boot users that are infecting the pool.
Add to all of that Intel itself, who purchased McAfee specifically to implement security on a hardware level in order to better virturalize and compartmentalize environments so that the antivirus would eventually become irrelevant. McAfee's own work will undo their main product line! which is wierd to think about
There are just so many levels of security now, that it renders most use-cases for antivirus as obsolete today. It is not 100% secure or anything, and the internet is still a very scary place in some regards, but todays issues are on a higher level of security (with businesses and web services), and there is less and less focus on end-users as targets as their systems become more secure, and the users generally become more educated.
McAfee are not 'just' AV - they completely shot themselves in the foot when they laid off their expertise in Network DLP (NDLP) based in Santa Clara. Attempted to move the technology to the Host DLP team in Tel Aviv but completely got it wrong - a completely different skill set in Tel Aviv resulting in the NDLP business dying rapidly. The Business Unit that DLP is contained within has had it's 3rd declining quarter in revenue and continues to slide.
Poor Engineering leadership was fully to blame for the death of DLP. The technology was acquired through Reconnex and was then a market leader - now it's dead in the water. It was at the very heart of the BU's strategy.
Where does McAFee get their Engineering VP's from?
Poor Engineering leadership was fully to blame for the death of DLP. The technology was acquired through Reconnex and was then a market leader - now it's dead in the water. It was at the very heart of the BU's strategy.
Where does McAFee get their Engineering VP's from?
- Status
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
RTX 4070 vs RX 7900 GRE faceoff: Which mainstream graphics card is better?- Started by Admin
- Replies: 8
-
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram