[citation][nom]assasin32[/nom]But in defense of apple, the last review I saw of the teardown which was for the iphone or itouch the design of it was improved. It incorporated a more simplified design which reduced the number of number of fail points which is a good thing.The side effect of that was that is that if something failed you had to replace one large entire part instead of having the option of replacing smaller cheaper parts.And lets be honest here this is a device meant to be used and not meant to be self repaired as there is no standard for parts for these types of things. So the primary goal is to build it cheaply and reliably. I seriously doubt any company spends times to make things harder to repair because it will mean it takes longer to manufacture and repair themselves.[/citation]
fail points are a tricky thing. Netbooks (crap as they are) have a TON of failure points... but because each individual part is cheap and relatively easy to get to, they are nice to work on. With apple products there are less points of failure due to the integration of parts... which means that when your wireless card, or a ram module dies, then you are replacing the entire board which includes the CPU, ram, wireless, graphics, audio, and motherboard, which is expensive. that is fine IF you happen to have a product that is rock-solid. But when it is not a solid device (last gen G5 towers, 1st gen intel Macbooks and Macbook pro, 3rd gen intel macbook pro, and various ipod devices) then you end up with a ton of failures where the only real option is to replace the entire device.