is 16:9 curved worth it?

[tal_1_]

I don't know what to do...
I was searching for a new gaming monitor and I found those three:
https://www.asus.com/ROG-Republic-Of-Gamers/ROG-SWIFT-PG248Q/
https://www.amazon.com/Lenovo-Monitor-27-Inch-Curved-65BEGCC1US/dp/B01FXDVZF2
https://www.amazon.com/AOC-AG241QG-2560x1440-Adjustable-DisplayPort/dp/B01N7QDNJ8

each of them provides G-Sync and high refrash rate but I don't know what to choose since everyone says that curved is much better but its not an ultra wide display its 16:9
and they are in the same price range too so please help me

 

[erik62905]

a 16:9 curved monitor isn't really necessary if it costs more. I would only go curved if it is an ultrawide monitor. Id say to go with the first one in your list (ASUS ROG Swift PG248Q).

 

[SkyNetRising]

Choose size. 27" is better than 24". It's well worth the money.
Curved/non-curved is not that important. Sure - curved helps with feeling of immersion, but it's not essential.

 

[velocityg4]

The benefits of curved monitors is dubious. From what I've read curved monitors only provide immersion when they fully encompass your field of view. Meaning you need a large display or for it to be placed very close. A 38" ultra-wide at desktop distance probably provides a decent experience. Anything less you'd be better off with a flat panel.